45 comments on New Year, New Price Poll
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
45 comments on New Year, New Price Poll
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel.”
—Saudi saying
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
IMO, the following top 10 exporters are probably in long term terminal net export decline (relative to the 2005 to 2007 levels): Saudi Arabia, Russia, Norway, Iran, Venezuela and Mexico (probably also Kuwait & Nigeria).
But the key metric to consider is the net export rate versus the net export depletion rate (depletion marches on regardless of whether production and exports are increasing or decreasing, in fact, higher net exports cause the net export depletion rate to increase).
Our middle case is that the top five net oil exporters--accounting for about half of world net oil exports--have already shipped about one fifth of their post-2005 cumulative net oil exports. One fifth gone, in a little more than a thousand days.
As of January 1, 2009, assuming a current net export rate of 20 mbpd from the top five, our middle case is that they are depleting their post-2008 net cumulative net exports at the rate of about one percent every 50 days. (About 100 GB left, shipping about one Gb every 50 days). For comparison purposes, Indonesia shipped about one percent of their post-1996 cumulative net oil exports about every 18 days from 1997 to 2000, inclusive.
IMO, the net export decline rate--which in 2009 will be a combination of voluntary + involuntary export reductions--will cause the decline in net oil exports to outpace the decline in demand in 2009, pushing oil prices back up.
How would a sharp drop in demand change your numbers?
It helps to keep historical analogues in perspective.
Just eyeballing a Thirties production chart, it appears that world oil consumption only fell in one year, in 1930. As "Downsouth" noted, there were three million more cars on the road in 1937 in the US than in 1929. The key difference regarding auto demand between now and 1929 is that hundreds of millions of people worldwide want to drive a car for the first time now versus millions of people in the 1929.
In the early Eighties, we obviously saw a decline in demand, but the price decline was very gradual (price decline of -6%/year from 1981 to 1985), as Saudi Arabia cut back on exports. The big price decline did not occur until Saudi Arabia boosted their production and exports in 1986 (price decline of -73%/year from 1985 to 1986):
And it remains to be seen if the 2009 average annual oil price will be below the 2008 average price.
I like to use the inflation adjusted oil price shown here:
http://www.wtrg.com/prices.htm
Of course it is a wee bit of problem trying to buy and sell in terms of inflation adjusted dollars. Commerce is done with nominal dollars.
But it's the only way that a graph that includes almost 100 years of price data can be even a little bit relevant.