![]() | Financial Forecast for 2009, Considering Resource Limitations | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: January 7, 2009 | ![]() |
50 comments on Natural Gas and Credit Situation - Nate Hagens Interview on Global Public Media
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
50 comments on Natural Gas and Credit Situation - Nate Hagens Interview on Global Public Media
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.”
—Claire Huchet Bishop
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
"The myopic focus on 'reserves' as opposed to flow rates and affordability will be our energy achilles heel in retrospect."
i'm having a little trouble with that statement. and imo, the myopia is in choosing either or, reserves or flow rate. you just cant have one without the other.
the physics of a dry gas reservoir are well understood, and i will state it here: pv=znRT. p, pressure, on the left hand side of the equation is the main factor determining flow rate and n, moles of gas, on the rh side is reserves(period). well, make that reserves =f(n).
and how you gonna achieve a non zero flow rate without reserves?
on one hand if the solution to our impending ng "crisis" is all in flow rate, then by all means drill baby drill. and what will be drilled are those 80% per year declining shale gas wells.
and on the other hand, there are sizable "conventional" gas deposits in alaska, just waiting for a pipeline to turn them into reserves. there are also sizable "reserves" via conservation, and as far as i can tell the only way to access those "reserves" is via high(er) ng prices. screw affordability.
that was my point. Energy gain is the driver of social democracy. Once we reach low EROI on NEW oil and gas, rising prices will divert resources away from non-energy sectors - the 'cushion' in the society will be gone - and the high prices necessary to 'drill baby drill' won't be paid by anyone (except perhaps governments, which is I suspect the path we will go)..(but it will still be money paying for energy instead of vice versa)
My main point is necessary prices to attain IEA/EIA production levels will never be affordable in a declining aggregate EROI environment. If we are flush with terawatts of wind/wave and solar energy gain, then it perhaps can be so.
"Energy gain is the driver of social democracy." Excellent, yes, but in order to gain energy, two things must increase: flow rate, and infrastructure to handle the flow rate. The energy grows and the physical infrastructure grows.
There is a parallel to the increase in energy and resource flows involved as a child reaches adolescence or adulthood, and is no longer a recipient of authoritarian parental rule, but may now make rules her/himself.
But the energy and resource flow levels are relative to surrounding infrastructure needs as well. Think "Lord Of The Flies".