139 comments on DrumBeat: January 11, 2009
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
139 comments on DrumBeat: January 11, 2009
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
There are lots of talking heads in Washington and Wall Street that are certain that the economy is better off when dividends are taxed high as ordinary income, and capital gains are taxes preferentially low. Some of these people would like to see capital gains virtually untaxed.
They have it totally backward, of course. The only concession to capital gains that makes sense is to index the basis for inflation. Otherwise, speculative gains (for that is what capital gains are when you back out inflation) should get no special preference at all. In fact, IMHO all capital losses should be treated the same way we treat gambling losses - you can only use them to offset winings.
On the other hand, I would like to see corporate income tax payments essentially be transformed into a tax withholding that passes on to the shareholders along with their dividends.
I suspect that if these changes were made, we would return to a bias toward dividend income rather than capital gains, and there would be more pressure on corporate managements to perform consistently over the long haul, rather than play short-term games.
I assume you realize that almost all stock losses are traded off vs stock gains, with the exception of a $3,000 carryover against ordinary income. Capital stock losses may be carried over, but with the exception of $3,000 can not not all be considered a loss for the current year. Having said that, I do agree there should be more emphasis on dividends.
I would like a change of emphasis towards dividends, particularly if the growth economy is over. We can still invest money in hopes of getting current income, but the expectation of cap gains will be greatly diminished post growth. It is better if the incentives don't push people to try to fight the trend.
Capital loses, are almost treated like gambling loses. If you have a million dollar capital loss (and don't get gains to offset it), you will die long before you use up your carryover.