![]() | Ukrainian Natural Gas Crisis Drags On | The Oil Drum | SER-2 [02] Memo on the Security and Solidarity Action Plan | ![]() |
79 comments on Higher Inventories but Demand Drop Slowing?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
79 comments on Higher Inventories but Demand Drop Slowing?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know, it's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
—Mark Twain
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Doesn't the contango tell you that there's an imbalance?
It seems to me that these loaded tankers sitting around are adorned with such a sticker for instance.
contango ... imbalance? ????? what ?
HFat you have to think harder at my question. The tankers you refer to are already sold to my knowledge, thus not part of my claim.
To understand the gist of my claim, you need to understand the basic idea of how oil is traded. It's an auction, consisting of discreet sales of units of 1000 barrels..... therein is the answer.
OIL IS TRADED AT AN AUCTION - therefore DEMAND ALWAYS = SUPPLY
An auction has an item - one item - and the asking/bidding price always narrows in towards each other ..... and suddenly those prices match, viola SUPPLYING PRICE = DEMANDING PRICE. It's like the stock exchange and you never hear of the idea of a supply-demand GAP there ... :-)
... you see ?
Another way to look at it is that you demand oil at 10 dollars /barrel today .... I'm not holding my breath neighter should you. Q: When do you believe Supply will be coming down to your price ? Ever ?
I understand what you're saying but it's a tautology.
What's more interesting I think is to look at the consumers' demand as opposed to the gross demand which includes hoarding. In that sense, supply has been stronger than demand in the last few months leading to unusually high storage. This is not a sustainable state of affairs obviously.
The reason I brought up the strong contango is that it's an indication of market participants expecting higher prices going forward. Additional buyers intent on hoarding the stuff have been showing up on the market, keeping the spot price higher than it would otherwise be.
There are probably many empty tankers still. Additionally, many tankers currently in transit could easily be turned into floating storage as the OPEC cuts are diminishing the amount of oil in transit.
Alright, back to my initial point.... Supply-Demand Gap. There is no such thing . Thats my point.
If a comodity is in short supply (acquiring-) price will go up , on the contrary it will go down. (basic trading knowledge).
Philosophy:
There is no gap in "anything" unless you set a "fixing point" - a standard "no gap" position. Think of a door, as long it's closed there is no gap, open it .... there you go, gap there is ... big / small defined by the angel of opening.
Lesson :
1) ... unless there is an universally accepted price for an oilbarrel at say 100$ there vil never be any gap in supply/demand.***That will happen every day***
2) or .. say if there is set a standard for "how many barrels that should be traded per day globally , say 85 mb/d" , one can start to argue "there's a gap" if there comes to a deviation from that number. ***That will happen every day***
So the idea of "a gap" has no value IMHO.
(I guess this gap-thing will continue, with or without my help :-)
Yes, this gap thing is somewhat silly. I figure it's a kind of colloquialism. But I'm sure you could understand what the poster above meant with this "gap", especially after it's pointed out to you that more storage is probably what is meant.
Words can have different meanings. There's no point in correcting people who keep using what you think are the wrong words over and over, is there?
HFat ; "I figure it's a kind of colloquialism."
Yes, I could agree with this, if this oil-supply-demand-gap-definition was well defined and understood, but I don't think it is. Many readers (people) swallow the consept that there is "gap-oil" somewhere ...
The reason I made a sceene of this is that I find these gap-arguments very misleading , to the extreme actually.
See what Noutram asks here "...any views on when the Supply-Demand Gap will close back up at present rates?"
HFat ,do you understand this ?
"... Gap will close back up?" I ask : which gap ? and back to ... to where .... to what ....?
With all due respect to all / Noutram : I don't understand this gap-thing ! you all are talking about.
edit:
As for all daily global oilproduction there is always "a gap" between oil in progress/temp.stored oil and actual sold oil for thet very day. Today this gap is more than last summer. BUT that has nothing to do with this SUPPLY-DEMAND gap "we" are talking about , no ? In this case there is always a SUPPLY-DEMAND gap. Always.
at what point does tanker storage peak out?