Remember, this is not my assemblage of anything. The only part I had anything to do with writing was the introductory paragraphs. I am afraid I didn't look too closely at the particular references the biofuels group give. I am sure they did not give evidence where biofuels were working well, but I am also certain that there are problems in some places.

The authors do indeed come up with the recommendation that we give up nearly everything (biofuels, wood, fossil fuels, and nuclear). I have said I do not agree with their recommendations.

Obama said again in his inaugural speech that wind, solar and soil would be the renewable energy sources. Those who think that soil i.e. bio fuels will not be part of the the energy program of the Obama administration are delusional.

He ran on a bio fuel platform, was elected on it and has given every indication that he intends to follow through. He has nominated Vilsack as Agriculture Secretary.

It was Vilsack who led Iowa to try to be a leader in alternative energy production. Wind, ethanol and bio diesel have renewed Iowa's long faltering rural economy. Now comes ideologues like the author with straw-man arguments that ignore the benefits of bio fuels and concentrate only on problems. Every change has winners and losers. There are more winners than losers with bio fuels IMO.

The article is heavy on global think. The most any country has is control of its own resources. There is no way to enforce the ideological agendas of those who see bio fuels as the devil. The United States has the right to maximize the utility of it's own resources, be it soil or what ever. And so does every other country.

Tough, but that is the way it is.

Nice lecture X. It's your biofuel scam that's delusional, given its failure in spite of record petroleum prices and government subsidies. If the stuff can't run under those perfect conditions then when?

My country and my president certainly do understand the stupidity of wasting good crops and soil on this senseless mess. Tough. That's just the way it is.

U say : There is no way to enforce the ideological agendas of those who see bio fuels as the devil

I say : There is no way to enforce the ideological agendas of those who see bio fuels as the saviour

Can you spot the plank in your own eye X ?