![]() | Passive Solar Design Overview: Part 3 – Thermal Storage Mass | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: January 27, 2009 | ![]() |
236 comments on Advice to Pres. Obama (#5): One Engineer's Advice for Energy Policy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
236 comments on Advice to Pres. Obama (#5): One Engineer's Advice for Energy Policy
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Politics and Peak Energy
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric cars an 'attractive proposition' for Australia
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.”
—Claire Huchet Bishop
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Is it possible (reasonable) to go back and retrofit some existing power plants for dry cooling? It seems like both the Southwest and Southeast could use the additional water, if it were available.
Retrofitting is possible, however the plants electrical output would suffer. Thermodynamics of heat engines, of which steam turbines, diesel engines, and gas turbines are examples, state that the output is directly proportional to the heat flux times the difference between the input temperature and output temperature. For water it is difficult go higher than about 350º C on the hot end because of corrosion, high pressure and other engineering problems. On the low side we can go down to about 50º C if we can use cold sea water for cooling. For PWRs, (Pressurized Water Reactor) this limits us to about 34% efficiency. With a dry heat exchanger it would be difficult to get the low end temperature lower that about 110º C which would lower system efficiency to maybe 30%.
One large advantage of the LFTR and gas turbine is it can operate at between 650º- to 900º C on the hot end. With an air cooled heat exchanger on the low end running at 110º C we have an efficiency of over 50%, and lower cost.
The Lower Mississippi River has no foreseeable heat sink issues. The volume of water is incredibly vast.
Just the shipping channel at New Orleans is 900' wide and 100' deep moving at several knots at the summer minimum. Add the water underneath the shipping channel and to the sides.
Alan
I was pretty sure 'frombigeasy' was refering to your hometown and not some techy organization that feels big things come easy (you do paint bright pictures with a broad brush). Always good to see someone give good information about a place they know well, thanks. :)
hit the key twice