112 comments on An Ethanol Bright Spot
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
112 comments on An Ethanol Bright Spot
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
What about Volkswagen do Brasil? That won't save the US car industry, but it would be the right company in the right place - right now.
Edit: Robert, I found it interesting to add, that the Scania engine you mentioned in your article is actually in use in a public transport ethanol project in Brasil:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioEthanol_for_Sustainable_Transport
AFAIK, ethanol in Brazil is produced via near-slave labor. Not exactly a model for the U.S. to ape.
The positive part of the Brazil/sugar cane story is that some of the plants burn the bagasse for process energy.
This is the future of the Corn ethanol industry. The strong thing about this technology is not only will they get cellulosic ethanol from the cobs; but they will use "fractionation" to separate out the corn oil, and be able to use the lignin from the kernels, and cobs to power the plant (thus, virtually eliminating nat gas.)
Also, the DDGS with corn oil removed are superior for feeding.
In addition, an ash is produced that will be used as a soil amendment (this is being done by Corn Plus, now.)
Yes, it is, but it can be grown without the semi-slave labor conditions without a significant dent on EROEI.
You see, sugarcane doesn't need a lot of tending. It also requires few or none pesticides and chemical fertilizers. In fact, using a tractor to cut down the canes is better for the soil the the way we do things here, which is to burn the field and then use manual labor to cut the canes. The reason we do things with manual labor here is capital costs. Instead of acquiring the expensive equipment (trough expensive financing), a lot of the cane growers hire migrant workers that will work for a pittance, but if they had the capital to buy the machines, or the workforce wasn't so cheap, they could run the same plantation on a similar cost (and EROEI), with tractors and such. In fact, we are seeing a movement in that direction here.
Also, the distillation plants are mostly modern, use very little labor, and they burn the cane itself as fuel for the distillation. The fuel consumption is small.
Sugarcane has it's issues, of course, chief of them being deforestations in large areas, use of productive land that could be use for foodstuff and waste problems at the distillation plants. The smell can be bad, too, having passed by a region full of those plants, I can attest to that. It won't solve the problem, but it can be done in a more humane way, without cheap migrant workers in slave-like conditions, and still be EROEI positive, if you have the right climate and right soils.