70 comments on Offshore LNG Generation
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
70 comments on Offshore LNG Generation
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The nighttime photos of the world really show the flaring quite prominently.
Presumably someone has decided that the economics don't justify the expense of harvesting this energy source. Perhaps such decisions shouldn't be left up to "the market"?
I have been wondering if the plateauing of atmospheric methane since about 2000 till a bit over a year ago was partly because many releases are now flared or harvested. I would appreciate if any one has info on this.
On the main point, isn't there a bottle neck in the US in that we have relatively few ports that are equipped to handle shipments of LNG? Has this changed?
Is there currently a bit of a glut in NG globally(even if some of it can't make it to market for reasons just touched on)?
If someone can post a link to an image of the world, showing night-time flaring of LNG, I can add the image to the post.
http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/wp-content/2007/11/flares.jpg
how do they shut out all the rest of the light and just show the gas flaring??
I might have thought they would use UV emission lines characteristic of flames, but even if some of those emissions pass through the atmosphere, it would take a specialized satellite. Instead, according to the huge PDF that is the "report" linked on the NGDC Earth Observation page, it looks like they use educated guesswork. To oversimplify, a gas flare is apparently a bright light that appears in a generally unexpected place such as over water, is steady for a period of time, but not too many years, is generally round in shape, and is identified with substantial effort by human analysts rather than by fully automatic means. So the map is probably laboriously produced, and pretty good but not perfect.
I have been wondering if the plateauing of atmospheric methane since about 2000 till a bit over a year ago was partly because many releases are now flared or harvested. I would appreciate if any one has info on this.
Flaring was always the most common thing to do.
Presumably someone has decided that the economics don't justify the expense of harvesting this energy source. Perhaps such decisions shouldn't be left up to "the market"?
It used to be that nobody could afford to let the ship stay put while it filled itself.