155 comments on DrumBeat: February 21, 2009
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
155 comments on DrumBeat: February 21, 2009
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Well, if they were to act on it by burrowing deep in the Earth, we would probably be better off..
I remember reading Ghawar oil was made from the excrement of some long dead worm, or some such. I'm guessing there is WAY more waste coming out of all holes of a congressman than a lowly worm. Should be the beginnings of a lot of oil on Capitol Hill.
Ceiii2K:
Your colorful comment
deserves a little clarification, from a geologist's perspective: What you probably read was that the actual ROCK from which the oil in Ghawar field is produced, i.e., the stratum that holds the crude oil in its pore spaces, is in part a peloidal limestone, and that these peloids are the fossilized excrement of ancient worms, or crustaceans, or some other marine organism that lived during the Jurassic Period. And from what I have seen in recent months from studying many thin sections of core samples through the Arab-A, Arab-B, Arab C, and especially the Arab-D horizons (from two other KSA fields, but not Ghawar), I agree with that statement.
The actual OIL in Ghawar and other oil fields in its vicinity is probably derived from the fats and oils (lipids) that were present in countless marine microorganisms such as zooplankton, which thrived in the Jurassic seas, and the remains of which accumulated over time on the Jurassic seafloor. This marine sediment is now a shale (named the Tuwaiq Mountain Formation) that is older than the Arab A to D formations, and stratigraphically beneath it. Over time, this layer of marine mud and microorganisms was buried and heated at depth in Earth's crust, and in the process the oils in those microorganisms was physically separated, maybe in sort of the same way that heat applied to uncooked bacon (or most other meats) will soon result in the appearance of two phases, a solid (cooked meat) phase and a liquid (oily) phase. The solid remains of the fossils are still in the Tuwaiq Mountain Formation, but the liquid that was driven off by heating has migrated upward in Earth's crust over time, into the porous Arab formations (and other horizons as well), where it was trapped in the pore spaces because further upward migration was not possible owing the presence of thick layers of impermeable anhydrite, an evaporite deposit that formed also during Jurassic time when an enclosed or semi-enclosed sea dried up several times.
The geology of the Persian Gulf oil fields is fascinating, and of varying complexity from field to field, as discussed in laymen's terms in "Twilight in the Desert" by M. Simmons, and, in numerous AAPG publications, in more technical terms.
I figured I had oversimplified it. Thanks for this explanation though. It does clarify what I thought I understood.
How would future paleontoligist intrepret finding fossilized politicians and fossilized lobbyists? Hopefully they will be buried along with fossilized ideologies!