I find it most interesting this tack that HARM is taking, the deliberate use of guilting tactics to drag in hot button social issues implying that Marinites are opposed to the lower classes and thus any social agenda that actually helps the poor must be ignored.

This insidious tactic is a well-worn right wing ploy that we will, unfortunately, see more and more frequently in the coming years, if not months, as we speed towards the brick wall of collapse.

The truth is corporations could give two hoots about you, the environment, the world. They are in it for the profits, the rest of us be damned, including the right and left wing rich people.

It is precisely HARM's sort of argument that will result in nothing significant being done to prepare the planet for the upcoming catastrophe. We will not see a coordinated effort to stop the one thing that is causing the problem (development, growth, etc.) because, while the top hatters scream at the people in steerage and vice versa, the ship goes down.

It is too late. The time to get serious has passed. No amount of social, technological, economical, or ecological tinkering is going to prevent an extremely gruesome and painful crash.

Obama is tied to the status quo and speaks of restarting the growth engine, the very thing that got us in this predicament.

I know the crowd here thinks itself the cool-tempered scientific elite, that their thinking is unmarred by the emotional messiness of the liberal arts, but the truth is they are just as committed to the underlying faulty paradigm as the rest of the world.

The Marinites (lovely name--reminds me of "The Ancient Mariner" in many ways) will suffer as much or more than the hoi polloi in the flats of that desert city L.A., just as much as the S.F. intelligentsia, because there are no walls in an ecology. There are only flows.

The one thing that is certain, everyone gets to participate in the collapse.

Ain't we got fun?

Well done deconstruction and analysis.

If by "Well done deconstruction and analysis" you mean "politically biased ego projection", then we're in 100% agreement.

Maybe you should re-read Cherenkov post again with your feelings/ego in firmly in hand.

Cherenkov does not accuse you of being from the right, he simple states that the type of argument you used is typical of the right's politics of division. He also states that this sort of argument will be used to delay any action and that it is already too late. I don't think that that is an attack on you, just an analysis of your post.

You do use a lot of emotionally-laden words to describe the citizens of Marin. Is this more about your dislike of Marin?

I think allowing localities to self-govern, even if they are selfish and short-sighted, is a good thing. Besides, if you are right about their faults, then they will begin to suffer for them as poor labor they need finds it increasingly difficult to get to Marin.

Is this more about your dislike of Marin?

Yes. Beautiful landscape, but... most of the people living there, not a terribly nice or egalitarian bunch.

I never meant to write a pro-corporate broadside against sensible conservation. I suppose I'm just tired of rich, smug, Bay Arean faux leftists pretending their protests are all about the environment or the children, when it's really all about keeping *their* property values up and diverting ugly, but badly needed infrastructure projects to poorer neighborhoods.

Anyway, sorry for the diversion --Marinite rant off.

when it's really all about keeping *their* property values up

Stop assuming you know what the heck we're thinking over here. Would you like me to interpret all your actions in the worst possible way? You're not helping and you'll just get the targets of your rants angry that their commitments aren't being recognized and honored. Then we'll just shut you out of the conversation and do whatever we want because it will have become clear that there is no way to win with you.

Are you always so ungenerous as you righteously judge other people's actions?

Cherenkov,

Funny how you assumed I'm a Limbaugh/Kudlow/Cheney-loving right-winger (I'm not) and projected the entire corporatist/neo-con worldview on me, all based on one post about Marin's insufferable smugness. If you disagree with my opinion of Marinites (as you obviously do), that's fine, but please spare me the straw men and your Fox News fantasy projections.

All I was implying was that Marin is largely populated by smug, hypocritical, self-serving and largely wealthy liberals --which it is. And I'm well aware that there are also many wealthy enclaves populated by smug, greedy, and equally self serving Republicans (as others have already pointed out). I guess the only real difference is, the rich right-wing snobs usually don't pretend to be advocating "for the little people" while simultaneously promoting economic policies that screw them, the way that your typical CA limousine lib does. Of course, the right-wing rich prefer to use other forms of misdirection --such as religion, gays (culture war wedge issues) and "free trade" ideology... but that's a topic for another discussion.

Are Marinites "opposed to the lower classes" (or at least the neighboring poor)? Well, based on their opposition to anything that might lead to affordable housing and public transportation anywhere *near* their neighborhoods, not to mention their "liberal" ;-) use of and political support for illegal labor vs. American labor, frankly YES. Does any of this change the inevitability of P.O. or the need for the world to find viable energy alternatives, reduce our populations, etc. while we still can? No. And what does any of this have to do with the price of tea in China? Not much.