I think this is blindingly obvious. Once Prohibition was repealed the lucrative profits from bootlegging/speakeasies/etc vanished, and so did the likes of Al Capone, Baby Face Nelson, Pretty Boy Floyd, and the rest. 'The Mob' did not disappear, but retreated into the more benign background of gambling/numbers/casinos, protection rackets, an so forth. Think about it: the U.S. had carloads of mobsters driving around making hits on people with Tommy guns. There was a running gun battle between the Feds and the Mob.

Decriminalize drugs, and the profit motive for the cocanistas and all the other drug lords goes poof in a heartbeat. It is just that simple.

I really don't want to hear any moralizing from the self-appointed guardians of America decency out there about this. Plain old cigarettes have killed over 400,000 people per year for decades and no one says boo hoo to any of that. In fact, plenty of people (some who I personally know) and politicians go to great lengths defending the 'right' of God-fearing patriot American tobacco farmers to grow their poison and profit from it. Plenty of beer-soaked bubbas would start a revolution if we tried (again) to crack down on alcohol, the abuse of which aslo kills many people each year. These apologists always invoke personal responsibility and personal liberties when they defend the legality of these substances...but draw their own arbitrary line at invoking the same philosophy about currently banned substances. Hypocrisy much, anyone? I have never taken any illegal drugs, nor have I ever smoked, save for one tentative puff when I was 12 (it tasted disgusting). I drink a beer or a glass of wine once per month, maybe. My wife and my almost adult children are the same. Even though tobacco and alcohol are legal and available to us, we choose not to use the former and my wife and I barely imbibe the other very infrequently. There is your personal liberty, personal morality, and personal choice. BTW, I do support the right for government buildings and restaurants, libraries, stores, etc. to ban these things...second-hand smoke is NOT a choice for those who are breathing it and harmed by it. Do what you want in your home. For those who would talk about driving/working under the influence of drugs: There are laws and there should be very stiff penalties for that. This still does not obviate the right to ingest substances on your land/in your home.

Of course these ideas will never fly here, not in small part due to the the huge business that is the American Prison Industry. I've said this before here and I'll say it again: The US Government obtains many things from prison (slave) labor...office furniture (UNICOR, formerly Federal Prison Industries, with each desk having a slip of paper that is the 'Escape-Proof Guarantee), military uniforms, and much more. I would speculate that there are plenty of bribes being paid out to government officials in various 'law enforcement' and 'Dept of Justice' and legislative bodies to keep the co-dependent drug cartel BAU system rolling right along unhindered.

The little old ladies and other moralizers are supporting a paradigm that is rotting us from the inside out. If you can't stop people from doing it, legalize it, tax it, and educate against it.

What is truly sickening is seeing how the drug lord/drug trade has been and still is glorified in many American movies and TV shows. Another industry that would suffer if the current paradigm is broken. How many movies could be made about someone buying weed from Wal Mart?

Rant Off/

BTW, I do support the right for government buildings and restaurants, libraries, stores, etc. to ban these things...second-hand smoke is NOT a choice for those who are breathing it and harmed by it.

I went out to a night club in Bogota, Colombia last Friday night and thanks to a recent new law, no smoking was allowed.

It was so nice.

By the way, drug use is legal in Colombia:

Startling officials of both the United States and Colombia, a high court in Colombia, the source of most of the world's cocaine, has legalized the personal use of cocaine, marijuana and other drugs.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E00E0D81739F934A35756C0A...

I've often wondered what had more to do with the polestar of drug trafficing moving from Colombia to Mexico, this or Uribe's application of the mano duro.

My view is that all drugs should be decriminalized, and that they can be freely brought from a hospital pharmacy.
All consumers of said drugs must be enrolled in a treatment program.

Treat it with education/health initiatives rather than a criminal issue.

Of course the criminal issue would stay if you drove whilst under the influence etc - much like most places treat alcohol and driving.

Pretty sure that this concept won't fly - but the current paradigm is hardly working either.

Don't do drugs - but have been the victim of a burglaries by drug addicts looking to fleece stolen goods to fund their habit.

Your plan is just another form of criminalization. It completely ignores the real problems of recreational use and addiction.

Disclaimer: Haven't; never will.

Cheers

For the *vast* majority, there is no problem of recreational use, unless you have moral problems with people getting wasted.. In which, case, mind your own business.

The taxes raised from drug sales would have to be ring fenced for addiction treatment, but the casting of drug use as a problem in its own right is very much a political act.

There is more to it than just recreational use. I started that way, and then became fascinated with a different view of reality, the stepping out and back in, adds a remarkable clarity to thought. Doing some Sandoz acid back in the 60's led me to some truly inspiring places. It is a large part of who I am today and why I live how and where I do. I am at peace in the woods. I have the stars at night and the wind in the trees. I chased that for a few years after, and lost count after I dropped acid for the 500th time.
I actually ended up doing public service when the locals had a really bad tripper, the cops would show up and I would get to go into the cell and talk them down. Not really down but guide them to a different place.

Once my first child was born I stopped all use of illegal drugs, not something you can do if you are responsible for a child, but yes I still drink and sometimes smoke. Roll my own, especially when I have a touch of Jim Beam.

The places and experiences I had I now go to in a different way, meditation, working with the chi, and physical labor. I do credit the acid with showing me the way the first time and I might never have known otherwise.

Mankind has spent generations altering his reality, prayer, fasting, flagellation. The interior of a mosque or church are desinged to take you from your reality. I was lucky enough to actually experience an Indian peyote ceremony. Read "Varieties of Religious Experience" by James if you will.

This is a story as long as mankinds story, with many, many chapters. Quantum physics is only just starting to explain or even admit some of these effects are there. Point you specfically to the non-local effect.

http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/penrose-hameroff/orchOR.html

Peace

Don in Maine

I would greatly prefer to be utilizing a joint right now instead of vodka to relax...ethanol has way too many calories...

I agree that the obvious solution is just not implementable in the current environment...

It is a shame that a country so adamant about a free market is so ignorant to basic truths...

Sigh...