![]() | Towards a New Sustainable Economy - Robert Costanza | The Oil Drum | Energy, Transport and Sustainability Changes in The Puget Sound Area | ![]() |
246 comments on Where we are headed: Peak oil and the financial crisis
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
246 comments on Where we are headed: Peak oil and the financial crisis
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Gail, I've suggested in the past actually calculating the differential on the amount of money spent on fuel, heating, etc., by the public as a result of the higher prices. This would help move your idea from theory to near-fact as the $ spent will likely align very nicely with what people couldn't pay on their mortgages.
You'd have to be a little careful with food and bio-fuels, etc., but I did a very rough calculation and came up with between 1 and 1.5 TRILLION dollars between '03 and '08. Back then, that was a lot of money.
But my math skills are non-existent and I'm just an angry keyboard monkey.
:)
Cheers
Good idea, but I am not sure I would know exactly how to go about it, either.
For one thing, the higher price of oil translated into higher prices of food and of goods of all sorts, so the homeowner got hit in many ways.
Also, it seems like there is sort of a multiplier effect as payments work their way through the system. The money a homeowner spends on oil products goes to a significant extent to pay foreign producers of that oil. If the homeowners had spent the money on their mortgage, this money would have gone to pay various employees of the mortgage company and holders of the debt, and they might have bought some additional products as well. This additional money would have helped the economy, over and above the original impact.
Gail,
I don't think it would be an efficient use of your time, nor would it be necessary, to track all that down. Just covering the basics of oil prices, (some of) the various fuels and some of the food commodities (particularly in relation to ethanol) would be enough to establish a minimum level of additional costs high enough to support your thesis. Maybe not even all I have listed. Like I said, I'm getting between 1 and 1.5 trillion based on oil alone.
Cheers