156 comments on Steven Chu at the 2009 EIA Energy Conference
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
156 comments on Steven Chu at the 2009 EIA Energy Conference
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Re: Bathtub
Mexico is a current example of Net Export Math. I estimate that their net exports have dropped from 1.9 mbpd in 2004 to about 1.0 mbpd in 2008. Assuming about a -10%/year production decline, I estimate that they would have to cut consumption at about -16%/year (dropping by half in about five years) in order to maintain net oil exports of about one mbpd.
I'm waiting for the example of a major oil exporter, on a sustained basis, cutting domestic consumption in order to maintain net oil export capacity.
In any case, I think that this is the $64 Trillion question. How will the competition between consumers in importing countries and consumers in exporting countries play out in the years ahead?
I talked to someone from Pemex and found out why they are importing so much gasoline and diesel now. (Apparently the gasoline is not particularly from the US.) Part of the problem is that they don't have enough refinery capacity, so some oil goes to the US, gets refined, and sent back.
Another problem is that the government has had a program to encourage auto ownership, so now they need a lot more fuel for the autos.
The third problem is on the diesel side, the country now has the same ultra low sulfur requirements that the US has, because trucks from the US need to refuel in Mexico and then go back. There were also some local laws passed requiring the ultra low sulfur diesel. Mexican refineries are not capable of producing the ultra low sulfur diesel, so it has to be imported.
To look at Mexico's oil use now days, one really has to net petroleum products imported into Mexico against crude oil exported.
Of course, the net export number incorporates imports of refined products.
Mexico's overall numbers are quite close to the Export Land Model--four year production decline rate of about -5%/year, with consumption at about half of production in 2004 and a four year rate of increase in consumption of about +2.4%/year. With some increase in consumption, this has resulted in a four year overall net export decline rate of about -16%/year, with the estimated 2008 net export decline rate being about -34%/year, showing the expected accelerating net export decline rate.
Here is Mexico's (EIA) consumption through 2007 (based on Pemex data, I estimate 2008 consumption at about 2.2 mbpd).
Here is the problem. If they wanted to maintain a net export rate of 1.0 mbpd, assuming a -10%/year production decline rate (the 2008 decline rate), they would have to cut their consumption in half over a five year period, to about 1.1 mbpd.