162 comments on Olduvai Theory: Toward Re-Equalizing the World Standard of Living - Richard Duncan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
162 comments on Olduvai Theory: Toward Re-Equalizing the World Standard of Living - Richard Duncan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
- Leading the Way to a Low-Energy Future
- Should you pay down debt?
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
- From Counterculture To Cyberculture: The Life And Times Of Stewart Brand
- Improving the Performance of Solar Thermal Power
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“No civilization can survive the physical destruction of its resource base.”
—Bruce Sterling
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Even if we don't want to equate per capita energy with standard of living, I think there is some validity to what Duncan is looking at. It clearly doesn't equate with happiness, but it does measure something of importance--how much of the earth's resources we are using each year.
Reducing the use of earth's resources is tricky. Clearly, there are many, even in the "developed" countries, who are barely getting along now. Think of all of those who are unemployed, or have minimum wage jobs now. A reduction in energy usage needs somehow to leave even the poor with enough--otherwise there is starvation and homelessness.
Once energy inefficiencies are wrung out by rising prices,the energy consumption/living standard model looks as if it will hold up just fine to me.Prices are already much higher in Europe and no one should be suprised that they are therefore much more energy efficient than we are here in the states.
Furthermore historical development patterns well established in Europe before the arrival of the automobile probably play a significant part in this debate-any world travelers on the Drum tonight can elaborate.
And of course there is no reason to think that we can't raise energy efficieny levels substantially by reorganizing-shipping by rail instead of truck,etc-and by improving- getting Prius mileage out of all our cars,tec.
But the CORRELATION WILL STILL BE VERY VERY STRONG and I am frankly amazed that so many regulars here don't seem to realize this obvious fact.Maybe every body is more interested tonite in playing gotcha.Lots of good metrics need "calibrating" from time to time.
My apple production is very well correlated ,on average, with my diesel consumption,but my diesel consumption per bushel is gradually falling.
Take away my diesel and my apple production will plummet.So will all the living standards every body seems to think are not correlated with energy consumption.
After most of the ineficiences go away, energy use per capta may become a good heuristic. Yep, it is good enough for analising the EU, or the South America, or Asia. Yet, it isn't good enough to apply into the entire world today.
Maybe after energy becomes more expensive, it will be good enough for comparing very different countries. Today it isn't.