149 comments on The 2012 Oil Crunch vs. Cash for Clunkers
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
149 comments on The 2012 Oil Crunch vs. Cash for Clunkers
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
There are any number of solutions to our energy problems that would work if we expend a huge amount of capital on them.
One of the problems we have is that oil price spikes will cause recurring recessions (or worse) that will destroy capital. This past recession has been rough on renewable energy because a good deal of the capital they had drawn on dried up.
How will we afford these solutions that are so enormously expensive?
Something I've been wondering is what the net effect on the grid would be of millions of compressors running simultaneously.
Just like another hot humid summer day in South Florida when all the AC units kick in at full load.
[url=http://anz.theoildrum.com/node/3388]The Oil Drum: Australia/New Zealand | The Air Car - A Breath Of Fresh Air Or A Waste Of Breath ?[/url] has more than a few answers of course. Coal powered compressors would be no better than petrol according to one source; would compressing NG which has been diverted from electricity generation be any improvement aside from having an ostensibly large supply?
I can't see NG being any sort of long-term solution. My estiamte puts US resources of N gas at about 1,000 bcf (includes tight, not hydrates). At 23 bcf / yr present consumption, that's only about 40 years so we shouldn't be doing ANYTHING to increase N Gas consumption, especially not using it to support purchases of new guzzler autos.
Small PHEV and EV's is the way to go, with maximum support for generating electricity renewably. Better yet is the new light personal urban transport systems on rails. Since the vehicles and tracks are so light we could easily afford to cover cities with track grids at 1/2 mile intervals, meaning everyone and every place would be within 400 yards of a station.