Darn. And I thought we were saved. Thermodynamics will probably get in the way again.

Even if this is on a small scale, it shows that there is an available means for getting the fuel we will need on some level. I do not think this is scalable in enough time to keep the wolf from our door in the form of import shortages, so aptly expressed in your writings, WT. Another thing which they leave out is the transportation costs - conventional oil resources have pipelines, and coal is not so easily transportable. Thus, the little plants UTA envisions will have to rapidly populate the locales where coal is presently mined and then we can develop that conventional transportation infrastructure. I doubt that the large scale development of this technology will make a difference in my lifetime, but maybe for my two kids and three grandkids.

The problem is not whether the energy source is available - there is still plenty of crude oil available, at least as much as we have used so far - the problem is whether it is affordable at the flow rates required for anything like BAU.

Most of the world's population can't afford any FF at current prices - if your country is already massively in debt and will only be able to afford FF by going even further into debt why do you assume you will be able to afford to buy adequate amounts of FF in the future?

There is always a BAU and in the Stoneages the business circled around : 'Where the heck is my next stone'