![]() | Bush: Short Term Conservation Needed | The Oil Drum | Our Insider and Rigzone say the damage is bad...but the question is how bad? | ![]() |
21 comments on Reviews of the Bartlett Energy Conference
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
21 comments on Reviews of the Bartlett Energy Conference
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly - November 2008
- The 2008 IEA WEO - Production Decline Rates
- The EU Strategic Energy Review: maybe not so depressing after all
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
There were about 200 people and at least half were professional suit and ties from the DC political world. In attendance were three state legislators from the local area. Bartlett's staff were professional and effective. Some lobbyists present, most apparently sent by their higher ups to observe and report. An extensive amount of hair creame on the males, big hair on the women; as an observation. They listened politely and attentively; body language said that the material was new for many of them. Out in the smoking area very little of their between session conversation was on the topic, quite a bit of light hearted disparaging comment including one of "I guess this is where they want us to drink the cool-aid." A very "Republican" crowd among the "Suits" so I gather that Bartlett has been button-holing his fellows to listen-up. For that he should be credited.
Although the public crowd seemed very Peak Oil aware, I would not call them a pony-tail and granola set, but then at my age I do know what that crowd looks like! There was one (1) ponytail in attendance (this is a people watchers report, after all) I was struck by the apparent social diversity of the public side of the attendees. Two arrived by bicycle.
It appeared that this may have been planned as a full day seminar, then compressed to under 3 hours of actual talk time. The presentations were very rushed. If I was unfamiliar with the topic, it would have been difficult to understand the thrust of the Peak Oil arguement. In all, disappointing and a disservice on Bartlett's part to his DC based observers, for whose benefit I believe the conference was held. Limiting the presentations to the big three would have been much more effective.
A word about two of the presenters. I have followed Simmonds since he first began posting to his corporate site; and the rising sense of urgency is palpable. He is very worried and I think basically shares the view of many here that we are in for a catastrophe that it is already too late to fully avoid.
Howe was in fact very rambling, if still charming. He made the only comment that generated a spontaneous interuptive applause from the attendees when he began a sentence with "If we rely upon market signals it will be too late..." My only question was addressed to Howe, and I asked him to comment on the work of Jay Hanson and the possibility of a Global "Die-Off." The question never got to Bartlett (who was presenting the questions from written slips) as I observed it thrown in the trash by his aide in attendance. Afterwards Howe said to me that "Those of us who have followed this for years know that it is already far too late. Perhaps if we had started twenty five years ago."
Howe was the only one who had enough courage to say the "markets" solution was bullshit and it is too late to wait for the markets to adopt and that we need to go to rationing immediately. Congressman Bartlett made the excuse that PO is merely "important" rather than "urgent" and that politicians are forced by the system to attend to the "urgent" (hurricanes) while ignoring the "important" (imminent collapse of our way of life).
I for one do not accept these half-laughed-away giggle excuses. (Hee Hee hee.) If Bartlett is representing the best intersts of his voters (Maryland) rather than his own best interests (getting financial support from the party for re-election), then he would stand up to the powers-in-office and call them out on the mat rather than making excuses for them. What good is winning the next election when there will be no "public" to serve after the imminent collapse. Katrina shows us how close to the edge we are. Katrina was a dodged bullet to the head because the full script of the "Oil Storm" movie did not play out. It was too close for comfort. The party games need to end.
As for Republicans versus Democrats, and our different ways of dressing and swaggering about, I don't think Mother Nature gives a hoot.
I agree it was rushed. Many of the talks were designed to be an hour, and these guys were just pushing through as quickly as they could.
I didn't listen to the folks in the lobby inbetween sessions - I got stuck in a long line for the mens room. The people I did speak with were for the most part already quite familiar with the topic. I did talk to one guy I know for whom this was all new, but he seemed pretty open-minded about it all.
The problem is that PO is a large subject, and it takes a while to get your head around all of the different aspects of it. For many people the initial response is likely to be one of denial. What makes it worse is that you have the Cornocopians running around telling people just to hang tight and do nothing, which just serves to muddy the waters.
I was meaning to ask Bartlett whether there are other members of Congress who share his views, but I didn't think to write it down on one of those little cards.