This is my first post .  I enjoy reading the oildrum largely because of a higher level of civility .  This post Is, in the short run, off topic .  
Pigeonholeing: I'm 62 years of age and retired .  I have a master of arts degree in sociology with a minor in psychology .  I view myself as a paleo-conservative .  
I love metaphor and would like to suggest two.
western industrial capitalism , in the context of our times, can be studied as a Ponzi scheme .  Inexpensive , available fossil fuels and rising population are required to keep the game going .  The game is over .  How disquieting !  
The second metaphor may give Many reader's a headache.
a significant number of those who post here have a background in the hard sciences and know far more than I do about this topic .  The topic is linear programming .  Some readers may have never looked into this .  
In its simplest form , one minimizes Or maximizes a function .  This effort is subjected to constraints .The constraints can be viewed as defining a playing field .  The playing field must have mathematical volume in order that the problem Is feasible .  Take your excedrin now.
as we plummet into what has been called "the long emergency " feasible solutions do not exist on a political level .  Myriad special interest groups are clawing for power and influence .  I think that most people would rather die than scale back their ideologies .  Geological certainty will eliminate worn out inappropriate ideologies by eliminating the morons who cling to them. that'll restore volume to the playing field . At that time, perhaps, the optimization process can begin .  
Thank you for your patience .        
"I think that most people would rather die than scale back their ideologies."

Yes and who fosters most ideologies? Who is on top today?
 If you like, inspect Trust Us, We're Experts! by Rampton & Stauber.
http://tinyurl.com/cms8o

or

Coercion: Why We Listen to what "They" Say by Rushkoff.
http://tinyurl.com/dgoub

I second Coercion by Rushkoff.  I read it twice.  Everyday powerful forces are trying to shape how we think, and most people aren't even aware that's the case, or think they're benign or just out for money, but the motives are not as inconsequential as that.
As for how powerful forces shape what we think, see Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman, Manufacturing Consent, 1988.  It is an easy book to find in Canada but I hear quite difficult to find in the U.S.

The book lays out the systematic bias (much along ideological lines and who are 'official enemies' and whom are freinds) that exists in the mass media (and its political economy).  While I do not agree with all Chomsky has to say, this book is one of his (and Herman's) finest.

How peak oil is handled by the MSM is still largely to keep it off the radar screen - for now.

Sorry, I'm late on this, but what makes you think "Manufacturing Consent" is so hard to find in the U.S.? I can get a copy in 24 hours (used or new) from Amazon.  Maybe that's not what you meant, but I thought Amazon was a US based company.  (Barnes & Noble can get it to me in 3 days.)
(sorry for another post)...and my local public library has a copy available now, as well as TWO copies of the DVD...I'm deep in the heart of red-state Tennessee too...
This is good to hear