<Peak Energy Oz: Peak Oil and the Philosopher's StoneThe Oil DrumListening to the cacophony and trying to make some sense>

35 comments on Rigzone: 'Peak Oil' Argument Does Not Account for Nontraditional Sources

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

mikegordon on December 8, 2005 - 8:31am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
There is no doubt that using ANY resource that is grown in the ground can cause more serious issues than mining or digging out of the ground, but Hemp is the ONLY natural resource than can be produced indoors in controlled environments. Indoor production would negate the negative effects that this crop would have on the farm land and it could be scaled to any level needed. Therefore, the negative issues concerning Biomass fuels are eradicated.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Biologyfool on December 8, 2005 - 11:41am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
"...but Hemp is the ONLY natural resource than can be produced indoors in controlled environments......Therefore, the negative issues concerning Biomass fuels are eradicated."

You're joking right?  If you grow the plants indoors, that doesn't mean they no longet need N, P, and K.  Now you've got to mine for the P and K and use natural gas to create the Nitrogen.  You've just shifted the "negative issues" to someplace other than where the plants are grown.
-BiologyFool (who thinks MJ should be legalized for other reasons)

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
tom deplume on December 8, 2005 - 12:38pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
There is (or was) an hydroelectric facility in northern Canada whose primary customer was an ammonia plant. The electricity was used to electrolyze water for hydrogen and to cryogenically extract nitrogen from the atmosphere. Using the Haber-Bosch process they manufactured NH3(anhydrous ammonia). No fossil fuels needed.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.