The contents below are paid advertisements. Their appearance does not imply an endorsement by The Oil Drum.
“Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.”
—Claire Huchet Bishop
Search The Oil Drum with Google
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Technician: Super G
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Summer Streets a Success!
- Plan for Hydro-Fracture Drilling for Unconventional Natural Gas in Upstate New York
- Enjoying Life Close to Home: Fun Streets
TOD:Europe
- UK Energy Flow Chart 2007
- Brown pretends to be tough on Russia
- Russian gas and European energy security - a reprise
TOD:Canada
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
- Weekend Energy Listening: Wind Power with Paul Gipe
TOD:ANZ
Peak Oil Primers
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- Ecological Economics
- David Strahan
- Econbrowser
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- Environmental Economics
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Organizations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.






GAIA Host Collective
Now, I find the Iran/China connection most interesting because this is a case where China is really thumbing their nose at the US. The US had adamantly opposed all deals that had connected Iran to Kazakhstan via new pipelines. So, the US had been shut out on all counts. So, to all those Neoconservatives in Washington and at the World Bank, welcome to the Brave New World of oil supply & demand.
==AC
I'm serious.
The U.S. played its "Caspian Chess" with the simple-minded objective of "pipelines through anywhere but Iran and Russia." Now that we are analyzing the end-game, it's interesting to review some of the forced moves along the way.
1. Brought the Taliban to power in Afghanistan. The U.S. let its allies Pakistan and Saudi Arabia help the Taliban consolidate power in the late 1990's because it needed a unified Afghan government for the Afghan-Pakistani pipeline scheme. (The U.S. support for the Taliban, in part because of Unocal's lobbying, is explained in Ahmed Rashid's Taliban and to a lesser extent in the movie Fahrenheit 911.)
2. Weakened the reformist Khatami government in Iran. In 1997 the Iranians offered an innovative way of bringing Caspian oil to the market. The idea was to swap up to 500 kB/d of Kazakh & Azeri oil (sent to Tabriz, Reyy and Isfahan refineries) for an equivalent amount from Iranian oil from the Persian Gulf. This would have required minimal pipeline construction, since most of the Caspian crude transport would be via barges across the sea. American companies active in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan were enthused because it offered a way around the trade sanctions (swaping via Iran would be a way of getting Iranian crude while paying the recently independent Soviet republics). But the U.S. government did not allow American companies (who were major partners in all the major Caspian consortia) to participate in the scheme. The conservative Islamic Republicans still refer to America's undermining of this initiative as an example of the U.S. hostility to Iran.
3. Brought Russia and Iran closer together. Iran and Russia clearly did not see eye to eye after the independence of the Muslim republics of the Soviet Union. All that changed after the two old powers realized they shared the same interest in stopping U.S. meddling in a region of the world which was historically part of the Iranian (Persian) or Russian empires. The consequences of a stronger Iran-Russia alliance are still being shaped.
4. May have been a reason for invasion of Iraq. Returning to the Chess analogy, the U.S. assets in the Caspian region (e.g. Azerbaijan) were isolated pawns. There was no way for the U.S., as a naval power, to defend these in case of an attack. Also, the Caspian Sea policy was authored by the Clinton administration. Cheney, as a self-proclaimed military strategist and an oil-man, knew that the real prize was not Azerbaijan but Iraq and Iran.
So if Cheney has screwed up, and gets neither Iraq nor Iran, where does that leave the U.S. in the grand chess game?
Hoping oil shale works?
And after that the Moscow Oil Exchange wil open. How can that leave everything as before!?!?
The 386 km the Asia Times article talks about is to to tap these northern Iranian refineries (which are connected to the southern producing fields) to the Kazakhstan-China pipeline, thus enabling Iran to sell to China via pipeline instead of via sea.
The website Rigzone.com has maps of the Iranian/Caspian pipeline system (and many other regions as well). But they are difficult to read since they are meant to be ordered.
I completely agree with the potential impact of the opening of the Tehran (Euro-based) oil exchange in March '06 on the U.S. dollar. Yet another consequence of the way we chose to play the Caspian pipeline game.
(I wonder what history books will write about the Baku-Tiblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, and whether it was worth all this.)