From a short article by Prof. Lovelock:
Our planet has kept itself healthy and fit for life, just like an animal does, for most of the more than three billion years of its existence. It was ill luck that we started polluting at a time when the sun is too hot for comfort. We have given Gaia a fever and soon her condition will worsen to a state like a coma. She has been there before and recovered, but it took more than 100,000 years. We are responsible and will suffer the consequences: as the century progresses, the temperature will rise 8 degrees centigrade in temperate regions and 5 degrees in the tropics.

Much of the tropical land mass will become scrub and desert, and will no longer serve for regulation; this adds to the 40 percent of the Earth's surface we have depleted to feed ourselves.

I'm willing to believe that climate change can happen very fast, and I'm willing to believe there's at least some chance we've past a point of no return where it runs away and there's really nothing we can do. But Professor Lovelock's scenario is a little extreme for me. I don't get where he comes up with the tropical scrub and desert. Maybe I'll have to wait for his book. But it seems to me the worst case has to be bounded by somthing like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. The Eocene Climate was certainly incredibly different today. The adjustment would be absolutely brutal. But it wasn't scrub and desert:

At the beginning of the Eocene, the high temperatures and warm oceans created a moist, balmy environment, with forests spreading throughout the earth from pole to pole. Apart from the driest deserts, Earth must have been entirely covered in forests.

Polar forests were quite extensive. Fossils and even preserved remains of trees such as swamp cypress and dawn redwood from the Eocene have been found in Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic. As aforementioned, the preseved remains found in the Canadian Arctic are not fossils, but actual pieces preserved in oxygen-poor water in the swampy forests of the time, and then buried before they had the chance to decompose. Even at that time, Ellesmere Island was only a few degrees in latitude further south than it is today. Fossils of subtropical and even tropical trees and plants from the Eocene have also been found in Greenland and Alaska. Tropical rainforests grew as far north as the Pacific Northwest and Europe.

Palm trees were growing as far north as Alaska and northern Europe during the early Eocene, although they became less and less abundant as the climate cooled. Dawn redwoods were far more extensive as well.

and
The oldest known fossils of most of the modern mammal orders appear within a brief period during the early Eocene. At the beginning of the Eocene, several new mammal groups arrived in North America. These modern mammals, like artiodactyls, perissodactyls and primates, had features like long, thin legs, feet and hands capable of grasping, as well as differentiated teeth adapted for chewing. Dwarf forms reigned. All the members of the new mammal orders were small, under 10 kg; based on comparisons of tooth size, Eocene mammals were only 60 per cent of the size of the primitive Paleocene mammals that had preceded them. They were also smaller than the mammals that followed them. It is assumed that the hot Eocene temperatures favored smaller animals that were better able to manage heat.

Both groups of modern ungulates (hoofed animals) became prevalent due to a major radiation between Europe and North America; along with carnivourous ungulates like Mesonyx. Early forms of many other modern mammalian orders appeared, including bats, proboscidians, primates, rodents and marsupials. Older primitive forms of mammals declined in variety and importance. Important Eocene land fauna fossil remains have been found in western North America, Europe, Patagonia, Egypt and South-East Asia. Marine fauna are best known from South Asia and the southeast United States.

Reptile fossils are also known from the Eocene, such as the fearsomely enormous crocodile Deinosuchus, which lived as far north as Wyoming during the Eocene and grew much larger than the modern-day saltwater crocodile. Python fossils and turtle fossils are also known from North America. During the Eocene plants and marine faunas became quite modern. Many modern bird orders first appear in the Eocene.

I realize this is small comfort, and climate change worries the hell out of me, but I just can't get quite as far into the blackness as Prof. Lovelock.
There were no humans back there in the Eocene to cut down the trees to free farmland. In the absence of huge forests absorbing the excess rain and heat, the sun together with the wind and water erosion will start converting the farmland into desert in a matter of decades. AFAIK this is what happened after ancient Rome a Carthage cut down the trees in Northern Africa to build their ships.
First the Romans got to enjoy six centuries or so of intensive grain farming, much as is currently the case in those regions of the U.S. midwest where the aboriginal forests were felled in the 19th century. Of course, with modern farming practices, the notion that the midwest will continue to provide bountiful harvests for many hundreds of years to come is questionable.
Much less comforting still, is the fact that we have no idea at all from which era exactly origins the present global warming. Is it from 10 years back? 35? Maybe 50? No one really knows. If present global warming is the backlash of our fossilfuel burning of, say, the 70's, what will our present fossil fuel use mean for global warming in 2030? I think it will be a greatly accelerating process, way beyond what we can establish by reducing emissions to 1990 levels by 2010, as per Kyoto. Besides, the biggest polluters on earth are exempt or did not sign this treaty, and the ones that did will not be able to meet the goals. Not a rosy outlook for my country where 10 million people live below sealevel. I suppose I should be moving to higher ground before the rest starts outselling their homes.