There seems to be a total lack of interest in Iraqi oil. Iraq was supposed to be "awash in oil". There should have been large unexplored fields in the Western Desert. The production from the older fields should have been easy to boost with new technology and investments.

Now the US government knows the truth. Iraq is the only Gulf state where the oil ministry is in the hands of Americans and where they know the real state of affairs. The result: total lack of interest. Even the critics of the war don't like to mention the dismal state of the oil production. The war may take off about 1 mbpd from the world supply - as much as the the hurricanes in GOM. but no one seems to care and complain about the effects on the crude price.

Iraq is a warning sign. From all this we could guess that the real Iraqi reserves are far smaller than officially claimed. The announced new projects were not realistic. It is quite likely that all the Gulf states are in a similiar situation.

But what do these leaks in New York Times and elsewhere mean? There have been some talk about the failure of the national oil companies in boosting supply. The production of all the major private oil companies is decreasing and they would like to get access to the fields of the national companies. Iraq was not a success, but the Iranian crisis is already unfolding.

The reaction to oil supply problems and the perspective of the Peak Oil has so far been invasions (Afghanistand and Iraq), setting up bases (Central Asia and Africa) and covert operations (Venezuela). Only when heavy gasoline taxes are introduced in the US, do I believe in efforts to cut the excessive consumption.

There's a good article here.. It sounds like there probably is quite a bit of oil, but Iraq has been in a long series of wars and revolutions so the place is rarely stable enough to try and develop it.
No doubt Iraqi oil production is in a very bad shape, needs investments and could be somewhat higher. Exploding pipelines are not good for oil exports. These thing happen in a war. But otherwise there is this usual talk about increasing capacity a lot in the future. Practically every oil producing country talks optimistically about increasing capacity. They don't like to admit being in decline. It has been very difficult for the UK, even for the US. Countries in decline like insted to talk about the need for huge new investments.

My point was the apparent lack of interest in Iraqi oil. From the article of al-Chalabi we see that capacity increase would come from applying new technology to the mostly old, quite mature fields and repairing the ailing infrastructure. This is not possible during the war, and don't promise easy profits in any case.

The reality is that while experts complain about the possible permamenent destruction of existing capacity by mismanagement and lack of maintenance, nothing is done. It is widely acknowledged now that the war is unwinnable for the US and would continue indefinitely despite of the present political process. The get the Iraqi oil fully online something else would be needed. But obviously the Iraqi oil is not interesting enough to change the course.  

There are a bunch of large and medium undeveloped fields: Majnoon, Nahr 'Umar, West Qurna, Halfaiya, East Baghdad, Ratawi, Nasiriya, Khormala, Hamrin, and Gharraf . If you go Google these fields, you'll find details of past development plans for them that have been shelved, and you'll see that getting to 5-6mbpd is not at all unrealistic if the place could be stabilized, and there probably are somewhere in the general range of 50-100 billion barrels or recoverable reserves in the known fields. I very much doubt it will be stable anytime soon.

Here are some links:

The last is particularly interesting.