I believe about half of the US fertilizer industry has shut down in the last five years, as 90% of the cost is NG.
Let's not forget all that natural-gas fueled electric generation we've been crazily building the last 15 years.

So what's the cut-off order?

Business off first, then schools, then electric power plants, then homes?

Why do I feel like Cassandra?

Here's NOAA's temperature forecast for this winter:

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/lead03/off03_temp.gif

It does look warmer than typical in the central part of the US with normal temps in the Northeast.

My sister, an atmospheric scientist (what they call meterologists these days), says these forecasts are not very accurate.

But then, she's working on a military project with a bunch of guys who think global warming is a scam.

We chose to fuel our new power plants with natural gas because gas was cleaner than coal, cheaper than oil and less scary than nuclear. It was a reasonable decision then, and probably still is.

Obviously, you rate things in terms of criticality. Some businesses are more important than others, some goverenment organizations are more important than others, people should be induced to conserve.

Obviously, the power plants should be the last thing to be shut off.

But really, it's not going to get that bad.

Gas got cheap because of the development of a new technology in the seventies, bright spot seismic. Pressure waves and shear waves are affected differently by passing through fluids, so you could directly detect oils or especially gases. This trashed the price of natural gas for a generation.
Now we know that the easy gas is gone. Tight sands, arctic, off shore, tight shale, coal bed methane, etc, are pretty much what's left.
Ahhhh . . . then that is a problem. Bright Spot Seismic, huh? That's some pretty cool stuff.

It seems like the more I think about this, the more I start tilting in the nuclear option. There's obviously a lot that needs to be done in terms of re-ordering of our way of life to make it less energy intensive, but the nice thing about Nuclear is that it does appear to be a stable source of energy if you start using breeder reactors and recycle your waste until the point of close to net energy extraction.

But I'm hardly an expert.

One could also add, besides supply increases, conversion efficiencies to electricity increased with the introduction combined cycle gas turbine plants.  Today, these babies can reach a almost 7,000 BTU per kW-hr.

However, at the time I was adamant that the rush to natural gas was going to quickly soak up new extraction margins.

"Quickly" in the energy business is a decade.

Too bad Calpine didn't take my advice.

The cutoff protocol for various local gas distribution companies will vary, depending on many factors, including whether there are high volume industrial users in the system, whether there are large numbers of interruptible tariff customers with dual fuel boilers (typically fuel oil as the alternative), but most importantly on what is necessary to maintain system pressure.  In an electric blackout, the transmission and distribution system can recover from an outage rather easily.  With gas mains, if the pressure falls below a minimum threshold then we lose gas pilots and the supply valves close.  Most equipment needs to be re-lit manually and this means a building-by-building chore that could take weeks.  If a code violation is found the gas company crews can't relight the system until the defect is repaired.  Clearly this isn't something one wants to happen in the dead of winter.  In the past decade, lots of institutional and commercial customers have opted for the interruptible tariff in order to get the lowest cost.  The risk we face this winter is that if local gas distribution companies can't get enough from the interstate pipeline suppliers and there is an unusually high number of disruption calls, then there could be an unanticipated run on heating oil stocks at a time when supply is tight for that fuel.  Since the energy value of #2 fuel oil has been declining in recent years (down to around 133,000 btu/gallon from nearly 140,000 btus in the past), natural gas even at $15/mcf is at present a better bargain than heating oil, so there will be a reluctance to order too much of the latter as a swing fuel.  Not wise this time around.

The other problem is the big 800 MW natural gas electric day peakers that purchase directly from the interstate lines.  They are not regulated by states but by FERC, and it would take a declared federal state of emergency to throttle them back.