I don't agree this is a good scenario.  I would prefer a steady, but shallower decrease in supply with the resulting upward trend on prices.  Very sharp changes tend to destabilize the economy, close businesses and put people out of work.

The problem as I see it is that we have an artificial amount of product (oil and gasoline) in the system right now.  With no market signals to curb demand.  We are living off stored reserves that can't be maintained or replaced.  When we come to the end of this artificial supply there will be a cliff drop off of supply that will really force less consumption and spike prices.  

NC-I agree entirely, and I did not mean to imply this restriction in supply would create a sharp increase in price. It probably would not, because the projects being deferred are smaller finds with smaller impacts. And our oil conservation for the future would be more like a jar of pennies than a serious 401K plan.

Steady pricing is the most important factor here. Sustained high prices will cause serious conservation. Volatile prices will cause less conservation as people react to uncertainty: "I'll keep the pickup because gas prices will go down eventually" or "I'll trade down to a small car when gas prices stay really high."

Unfortunately, I expect long-term price volatility (trending sharply up, but choppy), which may give us the worst combination of more pain that results in less conservation.

Could be like a mini 'Peak Oil' OR 'Peak Reserve' if you like...