What's wrong with this analogy by the Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition?? Does the US have a 9 year supply of natural gas or do we have more?? Inquiring minds would like to know.. If we only have a 9 year supply of natural gas reserves, this would have a bigger impact than peak oil, IMHO..


The level of natural gas reserves varies over time - downward when natural gas is consumed and upward when new natural gas reserves are identified. For the past decade, U.S. proven reserves have ranged from 165 to 170 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) -- although, in 2000, reserves increased to 177 Tcf. It is important to note that reserve levels are greater today than they were a decade ago despite the fact that 185 Tcf of gas has been consumed. Some naysayers still point to the fact that the U.S. used approximately 22.5 Tcf of gas in 2000, and argue, therefore, that if we only have 185 Tcf of reserves, we " only have a 8 or 9 years supply of natural gas left."

This is nonsense. It is similar to saying that we only have a 10-day supply of hamburger left. The level of natural gas reserves is critical to ensuring the balance of supply and demand in the very short term, but is irrelevant to any discussion of long-term supply.

http://www.ngvc.org/ngv/ngvc.nsf/bytitle/supplyfactsheet.html

In the graphs previously posted on TOD regarding where our natural gas will be coming from, a large component in the future years is always "to be discovered." And yet I can't find a link to any of the graphics... does anyone who knows where they are want to post a link to one for me? The article implies the argument:

We've been frequently discovering natural gas, so naturally it's safe to assume that we'll always continue to find enough natural gas.

That would be one fault of underlying logic. The other fault would be that it doesn't mention the likely costs to harvest the gas we find. Unless natural gas is an unlimited resource (do the abiotic oil people also believe in abiotic natural gas?), eventually there won't be any to find. Much more relevantly as we continue to drill for gas, the easy and large spots will all have been taken, and either we won't be able to supply enough (too few rigs to drill enough small wells), or it will become too expensive (the industry has to pass on the cost of the new rigs needed to drill more wells per year to keep up).

Natural Gas in North America has peaked. And just like when Texas oil peaked in the early seventies there's increasing drilling activity for natural gas. But all the wells are smaller, so there's less gas produced despite putting more effort into finding it.

Natural gas, just like oil, will not just disappear over night. However it will at the very least become more costly to find more as we harvested the cheapest gas first.

Your observation should be of concern yes, until it is put in context. The US only has a FOUR year supply of oil left. We use 20 million barrels a day which is over 7 billion barrels a year. Our reserves are 29 billion (source BP website). So, the presumption is that we will, as we did with oil, start to import natural gas in a large way. As has been discussed, this is dangerous and difficult but looks increasingly likely. Even more likely is a turn to coal, which the US has plenty of (27% of the worlds total of 22,700 Quadrillion BTUs =5,690 quads.

At 1 trillion barrels of oil left globally - that entire allocation is only 5,205 quads and the entire world natural gas reserves are 6,343 trillion cubic feet which equates to 6,507 quads.

So, the US has rooughly equivalent BTUS stored in its coal as the entire world has in oil or natural gas. Can you say Fischer-Tropsch in a big way? Hello, greenland ice sheet. (and I live in Vermont)

I think the point is that it is much easier to expand the imports of oil than of LNG. Oil can be safely pumped and stored with very primitive equipment that LNG is very difficult to handle and it is very difficult to expand the imports quickly.

Currently the US imports 300 billion cubic feet of natural gas a month (if I read the EIA site correctly) or which only 43 billion is LNG and the rest is by pipeline from Canada and Mexico. (Exports are 55 billion of which 5 billion are LNG - to Japan.)

Now current production is about 1,600 billion cubic feet.  The figures have trended up and down and there is no obvious trend to show that it has peaked greatly, that I can see. This is because, I suppose, you can't store natural gas.

If it is going to start decreasing rapidly, LNG supplies cannot be expanded to make up the short fall, as I see it.