vinc -

And exactly how much energy do these cryocoolers consume per hour? If your power plant is using NG to generate your electricity, then you're still on a depletion curve. If NG becomes difficult to get hold of, then you're looking at another problem, but that one too, is related to resource depletion.

One of the points made is that the inputs for many of our materials are fossil energy - steel alloys, stainless, magnets, ceramics, silicon...  The question posed is: Can these materials be manufactured without NG. I think it is a very valid question. Heating with electricity has typically consumed more energy than heating with NG in manufacturing.

Replacing NG with electricity actually consumes more NG at the electricity generating end, and throws a very large load on the grid - that's why manufacturers have a special electric meter (called a demand meter) when they use large amounts of electricity. You get billed at the highest rate of consumption - if it's 10kw an hour for 2 minutes, then you get billed as if you are drawing 10kw an hour for everything you use. It definitely affects the bottom line, and it's there to discourage pulling a lot of juice.

These are the things a lot of us are thinking about and discussing - energy inputs and how to offset them or find alternative sources that are workable. The fossil fuel train is slowing down - we have to get off if we are to continue our journey forward.

It's going to take roughly the same amount of power to liquefy the helium at a central  plant as it will to run a cryocooler at the point of use.  Plus, you're eliminating all the trips made by the helium tanker.
Less power, I think. With a cryocooler you're just maintaining a constant temperature. Whereas when you liquefy it you have to do all the work of bringing helium from room temperature to 4 K, not to mention purifying it...

At any rate, a cryocooler that would have been much more than sufficient for our experiment would have used about 5 kW, which is comparable to central air conditioning for a large home in summer. A fusion plant would be a heck of a lot larger than our experiment, of course, so I'm not sure what their total consumption would be.

Well, presumably the key issue would be the EROEI of fusion.  The energy for the cryocooler is included in the "EI" part.  So the goal remains the same - to get fusion to the point where it's a (controllable) energy source not a sink.