26 comments on Revisiting the barrels per rig issue
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
26 comments on Revisiting the barrels per rig issue
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I wonder how Japan is going to make out. As Jared Diamond points out in Collapse, Japan has done a lot of things right; few countries as industrialized as Japan have managed to keep almost 80% of their forest intact. And the extremely low birth rate many Japanese politicians fret over may turn out to be a good thing in the years to come.
But they are very oil dependent now. Oil was the reason for WWII. Tokyo probably won't be a fun place to be in an energy crunch.
On the other hand, now that PM Koizumi has basically picked the even crazier nationalists Abe and Aso to fight over succeeding him next year, maybe some extreme tension with China and elsewhere will make oil less boring for him and many others.
Many people here still figure pissing off the Chinese is basically cost-free, because a lot of Japanese don't grasp what's at stake and how weak their position is. In the stand-off over oil deposits in NE Asia, I should think China has the better hand in the game. The US is unlikely to step in if an Abe or Aso regime provokes a determined and unilateral move by the Chinese. The issues concerning international maritime boundaries over here are too murky to sell bodybags to the US public and the Iraq debacle is likely to make people want to stay out of stuff the isolationists (in the US) could blame on the Abe-Aso-Koizumi approach. In a real stand-off, the Japanese would almost fold first, as most people wisely would not have the stomach to risk this going to a fight. Rich countries only go to war if they're sure they can wipe the floor with the enemy. So the nationalists here dream they're holding a royal flush when in fact their so-called buddies the Bushies have merely plopped their hand in a pot of lukewarm water. Waking up is so hard to do...
In military terms, though, Japan can basically shut down China's infrastructure because the Japanese technology base is so much higher. They have far more fissionable materials, too.
An all out thermonuclear war between China and Japan would not cause a nuclear winter crop failure problem if it starts now, though, because it is already winter. We would just have a much colder than usual winter and a late spring. Maybe shift our farm crops a little south.
Now, we are trying to get Japan forget the pacifist stuff and take responsibility for defending themselves. But they know a good thing when they see one, and are resisting.
I've also read elsewhere (I'd look it up, but it makes perfect sense, so I'll leave that to doubters) that given the Japanese technological infrastructure they are probably only about six weeks away from being able to produce nuclear weapons.
Just thoughts to chew on.
David
I've no doubt Japan could build nukes if they wanted to. It ain't that hard (unfortunately). Plus, Japan made lots of weapons and sold them to all sides during past conflicts, and they launch satellites and such, so they have the expertise. And due to their nuclear power plants, they have the materials.
But Japan was on the wrong end of nuclear weapons, the only time they were ever used. It's been 60 years, but they're still kind of squeamish about nukes. I don't think they'll be arming themselves with nuclear weapons any time soon.
In Japan, on the other hand, war is associated with defeat, deprivation, destruction and so on. For good reason, I might add. The threat of war would almost certainly cause a lot of today's nationalists to recalculate their positions. The hard-core nationalists would try to shout down dissent (as the Bushies did in the US), but that's hard to do in a media-saturated world.
So Japan would likely blink first. Let's hope these twits in charge here have run through the scenarios themselves, and know to avoid more pointless provocations. There are times when you have to fight, but only an amoral sleaze picks a fight and then sends other people's kids to die.