55 comments on Conference open thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
55 comments on Conference open thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It's difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends on him not understanding it.”
—Upton Sinclair
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
When I look at the current This Week in Petroleum - Gasoline report and particularly the demand section, the four week average is now almost the same as the four week average for last year. Also, the weekly demand amount ONCE AGAIN is greater than a year ago.
Other than perhaps a seasonal reduction in demand, I see nothing even remotely suggesting a demand destruction scenario from these figures.
Also, how can we still have a sizable percentage of Gulf oil production shut in, demand being the same as last year, and crude stocks continuing to build?
Thnx.
- We have roughly 1mbpd of lost oil due to Gulf shut-in.
- Are we not drawing roughly several hundred thousand bpd from the SPR?
- Are we not also receiving roughly more than 1mbpd "loan" from Europe? (I think this loan is about to end.)
If the above scenario is right, then that would explain the temporary downward price movement as well as building stocks. (That scenario explains the situation no matter what the numbers are if they add up to more than the 1mbpd shut-in for the Gulf.)Someone with better current numbers might be able to shed light on that.
Global production continued its pace of new monthly records in 2005.
Despite the new round of apocalypse posts at TOD surrounding the IEA Outlook, the concensus of Peak Oil and Depletion jars one back to reality... http://trendlines.ca/economic.htm#Scenarios
Similarly the graphs of oil/gas/gasoline at http://trendlines.ca/economic.htm#USAReserves illustrate that present stocks are ample and our problems stem from refinery capacity and distribution, not secular supply, which is clearly in growth mode.
Realize that the "demand" in these charts would be better described as "consumption". It's the amount of gas actually shipped for distribution.
You're right that the amount consumed is, for the second week in a row, somewhat higher than a year ago. This is despite the fact that gas prices are still higher than a year ago (although down a great deal from post-Katrina). Higher consumption with higher prices means that demand is HIGHER now than it was a year ago.
Your "talking heads" are to some extent a few weeks behind the times. Last month, consumption was lower than a year ago, so they had a point back then.
So why are gas prices falling? Well, obviously, it's supply and demand. Demand is up, so it must be that supply is up even more.
What I think is happening is that we took a bunch of measures post-Katrina and -Rita to try to boost gasoline supply. Regulations were relaxed to let the refineries increase production, we released oil from the SPR, and we borrowed oil and gasoline from Europe. But things take time, and there's always a lag from when a policy is initiated until when its effects are held. We are still experiencing the effects of these production boosts, even though we really don't need them so much any more. Supply is higher than it needs to be, and that is driving down gas prices.