13 comments on You have to repay a loan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
13 comments on You have to repay a loan
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
You can read it here. They still maintain the preception of 35$ oil and 6$ /MBtu nat gas. they were wrong on wind power by a factor 20 in 1998, the real growth of wind exceeded the IEA forecast 20times...
you can find my speech on IEA here
http://www.rechsteiner-basel.ch/allepub/41
Rudolf Rechsteiner, Switzerland
Great graphs as well.
It's amazing how hard it is to convince people that wind is cheap!
America is entering a dangerous situation the next couple years; relying on LNG to heat our homes and make electricity.
Close to 20 billion will be invested in the LNG terminals/tankers/pipelines.
Imagine what 20 billion could do for wind power.
20,000 megawattts! At 5 cents a KWH! For 25+ years and minimal operation costs.
OTOH, at $5/mmBTU and 40% efficiency, gas costs 4.3¢/kWh for fuel alone. "Pay for the next 20 years, or pay once and be done" sounds like a good slogan.
For governments to make correct decisions energy supply must be viewed as a risk analysis. It can be a wise insurance to diversify energy supply even if oil and gas prices drop (they won't). One can easily trash IEA oil price predictions by the fact: oil prices have increased by more than 30% in each of the last 3 years, they have probably predicted a static or fall in oil price every year.
Did you know China are building straw fired power stations?
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/login.php?red=art/2005/12/22/230197/Straw_power.htm
(it seems to be subscribers only now, and chargeable, it wasn't when I first accessed it)