With no sarcasm or ill will intended whatsoever, I can summarize the anonymous comments by saying: "Really bad stuff happened.  What does it mean?  Someone find me an economist!"

I'm completely serious about this.  Economics is the study of the allocation of scarce resources.  Various energy sources have suddenly become a heck of a lot more scarce than they were a week ago.

As a very short first pass, let me point out that in any market shock timing is critical; you can't talk seriously about the current energy situation without being hyper-aware of the time frame in the discussion.  The other often overlooked factor is market psychology, which certainly includes, but is by no means limited to, things like the phenomenon of people topping off gas tanks and making the collective situation worse.

We're in a classic market shock, in that no one predicted this would happen more than a few days before it struck, so no one had a chance to prepare to any appreciably extent.

Back to time frames, with a focus on gasoline:

We have the immediate short run, which I think of as the next few days, but no more than a week.  During this time I expect, as I believe Dave mentioned in another topic, for there to be spot shortages (as we're already seeing in some SE US cities) and quickly adjusting prices.

In the short run, starting in about a week and stretching to a month, we'll see prices settle in at a new level, likely in the high $3/gallon to low $4 range.  The chances are good that shortages will be minimal, with no need for overt rationing (as oppsed to the price-induced rationing caused by the market doing its thing).  The market will have "sorted itself out" as economists like to say.

The medium term, a month to perhaps six or seven months (basically until the spring 2006 cyclical oil price rise), will likely be marked by a major mental readjustment for US consumers.  Some will scream for gov't to "do something", some will actively seek and use ways to reduce their gasoline consumption (early adopters of the new mindset, so to speak), and some will keep fillin' the ol' SUV and driving too much and accelerating too hard, stuck in denial.  This staged response will slow down conservation efforts, but it will also prevent chaos--you don't want every SUV owner in the country to try to trade in their vehicle for a hybrid at the same time.

We'll also see real economic impacts in the medium term; reduced consumer spending overall, greatly reduced spending on transient entertainment items (trips to the movies and theme parks; buying video games and DVDs might actually go up as people shift even more to home-based activities), reduced resale value on low-MPG vehicles, etc.  Essentially, this will be the whole economy starting to reconfigure itself to accomodate higher energy prices.

Finally, the medium term is when we'll see some of that refinery and oil production capacity in the NOLA area coming back online.  This should ease prices a bit, but my guess is not much.

The long run begins with late spring 2006.  This is when people have had a chance to internalize the months-long experience and start making longer-term plans.  I expect that the car market will be very interesting, to say the least, by then, as many more people will be trading in old low-MPG vehicles for new(er), more efficient cars.

But we'll also see things like shifts in the size and location of new home construction, changes in gov't policies (hey, I can hope, can't I?), and a general but marked increase in the level of mainstream awareness about energy and efficiency issues.

And in the very long run, we're all worm food.

We have got to keep track of these posts to see how accurate they are 1,2 6, & 12 months out.

I hope you are right Lou.  I am concerned that fundamentals have changed.

I hope I'm right, too, although I'm so used to being wrong (insert economist joke here) that it doesn't much bother me any more.

But I think we can't stress enough to the less-energy-aware people we talk to that the fundamentals have indeed changed, and permanently.  Right now we're in the early days of a market shock, but the worldwide energy markets began shifting well before Katrina, and will continue to do so after the current shock subsides.

I keep telling people that 1) if you think energy is expensive now, you're in for a distinctly rude awakening in the coming years, and 2) it will never be this cheap again, at least not for any significant length of time.

In my opinion, those of us who see the big picture have a moral obligation to help everyone else understand what's going.  With gas prices rising quickly and some markets experiencing shortages, we should have no trouble getting their attention.

With peak oil debunkers, we have our work cut out in showing the big picture: http://alteng.blogspot.com
Odograph responds in the comments section.
lou-
Building awareness of PO--a clear and correct perspective--is a very important point. As everyone on TOD knows, this is a very complex issue. And Herbert Simon won his Nobel Prize for pointing out that people oversimplify complex problems.

Building awareness takes time--multiple exposures to an idea, from credible sources, delivered in a form that the intended audience can take in. This is hard enough under the best of circumstances. But it will be greatly hampered by interference effects--one incorrect but appealing statement can torpedo a well-constructed perception. These can be emotive: "It's just the big oil companies price gouging," or logical but not quite right: "It's a temporary shortage caused by refinery outages," and so on.

What can we do? Consider the good examples of the visible PO voices: Deffeyes, Campbell, Simmons, Kunstler, Savinar, and many more. Start the discussion, raise the level of discourse, repeat the truth.

Get out there. Be prophetic. Write. Cultivate the media, and be the voice on radio or the TV sound bite, like Heading Out on the BBC. Proselytize among colleagues, customers, clients, students. And be willing to keep doing it for years.

The ideas and the vision are here at TOD. We need to keep expanding our sphere of influence.

lou i like your post but you barely covered the fun stuff

like in the next few months the hording will start slowly
but surely.  the news reporters will find one guy in the
middle of nowhere who is hording and hype it up so everyone
get scared and the corporations will start advertising to the
market and say we have afforable gas storage solutions.

then democrats will start calling for more legislation but
Bush Jr. will say he is to busy helping people in the south
to deal with another partisan attack.  

in 6 months the only policy change will be that Bush Jr.
makes a promise to increase the capacity of the SPR

or maybe Bush Jr. will say this is why we need iraq oil
more or iran oil more.  

anyone wanna bet that with all the national guard gone private
corps. get contracts to rebuild?

"devistation is oppurtunity" from the movie the corporation
(www.thecorporation.com)

sorry if i missed something but why is nobody talking about the
indonesian currency drop.  all the poor countries are losing
it and rich countries are out bidding them and if there is any
large sacle long term economic problems they will only come from
the poor countires (or the ignorant irrational consumer panic)

(and for us USA citizens - how many have written their reps?)

re: Indonesia

Because the answer is obvious: Indonesia has subsidized energy too mch for too long and the markets know it.  In Indonesia, gas is something like 80 cents a gallon!  If the government tries to continue that subsidy, it'll go broke.  When it hikes the gas price enough to stop the fiscal bleeding, the economy will slow abruptly.  In either case, Indonesia is hosed for the short term and investors pulling out while they still can.

One bright side: Indonesian domestic consumption will have to fall sharply, and that puts more oil back on the world markets.  Especially if Indonesia resorts to being a net oil exporter.

I think your predictions make sense in the short term, Lou, but I don't think there will be that much effect in the long term. Gasoline futures are pretty much discounting the effects of Katrina by the November-December time frame. They expect prices to be back down about where they were last week, within 5 to 10 cents. If this prediction is correct then there won't be that much impact where it counts, in people's pocketbooks.

Most of the attention will be focused on the humanitarian problems dealing with the refugees from NO and other areas that experienced with destruction, and on rebuilding the infrastructure there. Once gas prices come back down, I don't think this crisis will be primarily seen as impacting energy costs, rather the other costs and problems will be predominant.