![]() | Taking a turn for the better - or directional drilling again | The Oil Drum | Is no news good news, or bad? | ![]() |
19 comments on Go ahead and drive less
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
19 comments on Go ahead and drive less
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
But... suppose prices go up to $90 per barrel and stay there for two years, then ratchet up to $100 for a while, $110...
Sooner or later, in that scenario, alternative energy will start coming online. And it won't all be carbon-heavy fuels. If we can hold out for ten or fifteen years without shortage, while prices stay high enough to make other forms of power profitable, then we may have enough technologies (worthwhile solar cells, better batteries for plug-in hybrids, etc.) to actually reduce our oil demand.
As long as I'm being optimistic, I'll suggest that we might even be able to increase our energy supply without increasing our carbon consumption. Tar sand and coal liquefaction will never be all that cheap, and there may be some exciting stuff happening in solar (reel-to-reel solar cells) and even batteries.
But, back to pessimistic... I really don't like what I'm reading about Ghawar, and the "if we can hold out for ten or fifteen years" doesn't sound all that likely to me.
Chris
Yes, that is a distinct possibility, but whether consumers make big personal changes in their energy consumption habits (and therefore business will have to adapt) depends on the RATE of change, not the absolute change,
I remember when price moved to 34 cents a litre (I'm in Canada) and at the time we felt it was robbery. Then 50, 60, 70... and a nice break back to "cheap" gas at 45 one summer. What a treat. Now we consider anything under a buck a litre "cheap".
Its all relative. After all, SUV's have been huge sellers for the past decade while energy costs have trended ever higher. The recent rate of change has picked up - that is what is causing all the handwringing and angst, not the price levels themselves.
I won't be surprised if we consider 1,20 a litre or 3.50 a gallon "reasonable" 12 months from now. When consumers get used to a price, they keep on buying, and all historical trends show consumers keep on buying.
The one fly in the ointment is that prices are back to inflation-adjusted OPEC embargo levels, but the pundits are doing their job, reminding us all that oil is a much smaller component going into GDP then it was back then.
US market index futures are not up as strongly ahead of the open but at the current levels there will be a gap up open and then.. who knows.
I'm sure markets will hold up until more detail is known and if the conclusion is "what me worry", well, its up in broader markets, down in energy, until something else clouds the horizon.
Seems a bit otherworldly out there today LOL.