But the poor do, in effect, have a standing in the House and the Senate, where lots of Republicans are eager to get re-elected in 2006.  If things got bad and Bush sat on his hands, the Legislative branch would take action and, if needed, pass something over a Bush veto.  It would be political suicide not to.  (Although in the interest of fairness, I have to point out that the $50B appropriation for New Orleans passed with 11 Republican House members voting against it.)

There are already Republicans who are distancing themselves from the Iraq war, including the guy who started the "Freedom Fries" idiocy.  A domestic heating emergency would have Republicans jumping ship in droves.

Now, whether the Congresscritters would actually do the right thing is another, and legitimate, question entirely.

More than likely, it would indeed by the Congressman paying lip service to their constituents.  Bundled inside of any $10 billion dollar social program bill would be $20 billion in business welfare to "help encourage new growth."  

I think people need to stop and remember that neo-liberal laissez-faire is only one directional, and that our representatives only work for us enough to pretend like they respect our intelligence.

Historically, poor people don't vote.  Or should I say not many of them vote.