Just a little clarification. Current U.S. consumption is about 62 bcf/day, not 75 bcf/day. U.S. production is at about 51 bcf/day. The other thing is that according to a model prepared by Prof. Douglas Reynolds (University of Alaska-Fairbanks) and me, given a North American natural gas peak in 2007 and EIA-projected demand, the U.S. might actually need to import 13.8 bcf/day in 2010. This is in agreement with the calculations of the Energy Ventures Group. I talked to Bush's gas lobbyist, Ms. Dena Wiggins of the firm Sutherland Asbill and Brennan, and she said that this is what they expect too. However, the tankers are NOT going to be there to provide supply to these terminals. I think that if you're investing billions of dollars, you have to check if you're going to have adequate supply. So in the end I believe that while everyone sees the need for two and a half times more LNG than the official EIA projection, the terminals won't be built if the investors are worried about tanker capacity.