80 comments on Stranded Oil Recovery and American Energy Independence
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
80 comments on Stranded Oil Recovery and American Energy Independence
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It's difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends on him not understanding it.”
—Upton Sinclair
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
You're very right about the DOE projects. Did you ever look at the fireflood at Saratoga, Hardin County, Texas operated by Mobil? Plunging oil prices in the late '80s did for that one.
There are a huge number of faults and reservoirs, and at least 28 producing sands. It was drilled to a very high well density by numerous operators. I did a lot of work there in 1984-1986, and the operator I was working with drilled about 20 frio wells in the field.
Mobil had the biggest lease in the field and got a grant and started a fireflood. For the non-industry types, thats where an operator pumps air in the reservoir and sets it on fire because heat makes oil thinner and the combustion gases help drive the oil through the reservoir rocks, about 1200 ft. deep and small acreage, less than 500 acres. They got production up to about 2,000 barrels a day by my recollection, and changed the oil from old oil to new oil under the Windfall Profits tax,plus got DOE Grants and Tax Credits.I don't remember what the cost was, but, the lifting costs were not cheap. And it was a couple of hundred wells-they had a large crew working for them-20 or 30 pumpers and technicians. Plus engineers, accountants, investor relations flacks, human resource folks, ect., all of the expensive supernumeraries of a big oil company.
I bought a ten acre lease next door that had five wells and new tanks, the operators had just walked away and left it when prices fell to $12 a barrel and raised $20K by hook and crook and got the lease up to about 10 bbls a day of production. We operated it for about a year, then sold the wells. My investors all made some money, but I figured out my net was about $5 per hour and a heck of a lot of gray hair and much experience. And with prices at $60/bbl I wish I had the lease back, the wells will still pump a couple f barrels a day, and have for the last 20 years in the oldest part of a field now over 100 years old.
So, in conclusion, I just don't see how big companies are going to raise US production by redeveloping old fields. But I think there is lots of oportunity for small operators here on the Gulf Coast to make a good, honest living pumping the dregs. Bob Shaw is right, conservation makes the best economic sense, but its important to recover what'sleft.
Its not a new process, companies have been commercially using it for 30 years or so. CO2 also occurs naturally in some fields. At Spindletop in Jefferson County, Texas the gas in the cap rock contained 25% CO2 naturally and the shallow 1200' wells blew in at an estimated 100,000 bbl/day and flowed for 2 years. This was in 1901 and is considered the start of the Gulf Coast oil business. There is an article in the Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in about 1906 that describes this and is very interesting. I don' think its available online but Rice University in Houston has a copy.