Davidsmi, you should strongly consider the possibility that you are not seeing the world for what it is.

Things are getting better for most people, and the poor are seeing the greatest improvements in material wellbeing.

This is not to say that we are "happier" or "more fulfilled" or that our lives are more "meaningful", but the people of the world are better provided for than ever before.

I never forget that the happiest people on Earth are recorded to be the Nigerians, and Nigeria really is a poverty and violence ridden country, but I was talking about "material wellbeing". Also intersting to note that "happiness" seems more correlated to relative than absolute income, but that's not the point I was making.

Take a look - the third world is booming - see it and celebrate it.

prove it - everything you say is counter to the statistics collected by the UN, the US, the EU, the World Bank, the IMF, you name it.
OK, I am willing. Shall we start with all the reports done by UN,USA,EU,WB and IMF this year.

We can go through them one by one.

I am willing.

You list all the reports, then we will agree a subset of them that are relevant, then have a look at them.

This will take months, but I am willing.

I look forward to your list of reports.

Johnny,

You're the one making the claims.  You should be the one doing the proving and providing your source material from which you've drawn your conclusions.

My bad - again I left off the <sarcasm> tag. I was trying to poke fun at grandiose claims made without backing. I failed.

Still, if you really are interested you might want to check out some of the very good papers at the UN site (we are in the midst of their effort to halve poverty by 2015.

Here's one I found particularly interesting -
http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2006/wp20_2006.pdf

That paper is not a UN paper, the UN specifically disclaims any responsiblity for it. It is merely a paper submitted to the UN and the UN does not vouch for it. Many bad and wrong papers are submitted to the UN.

In fact it is by Simms and nef - no more reliable than Exxon.

The UN publishes (and vouches) hundreds of papers every year that deal with this, but that is not one of them.

Hmmm, let me see. I suggest looking at papers at the UN site. You claim its not a UN sponsored paper. Did you even read what I wrote? Did I claim it was a UN sponsored paper? I said I found it interesting.

Looks like you are more interesting in negating something that  you think might go against your preconceived notions. Did you even look at the paper? I suggested it because of the discussion in it, some of which might actually support your position.

Please, if you want to have a discussion about this, at least do me the favor of participating in a conversation, not simply making your pronouncements.

ok, point taken, you did not claim it to be a UN paper.