122 comments on Cellulosic Ethanol vs. Biomass Gasification
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
122 comments on Cellulosic Ethanol vs. Biomass Gasification
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
You appear to be perfectly suited for a fine career in the Big Oil corporate world, but don't expect all of us to automatically swallow your claim to objectivity and impartiality.
I do believe you are sincerely interested in energy conservation, but would you be willing to state here out in the open that you work for such-and-such oil company and that you'd like all of us to use less of your company's product?
Corporate people, particularly engineers, generally have a hard time realizing the inherent conflict in publically commenting on issues that affect the company that provides their living. I know - because I've been there myself, in the environmental rather than the energy field. I will state flat out that if a company is paying your salary, you cannot in good conscious publically say anything negative about said company (if you want to keep your job). There is a lot to be critical about the oil industry, but you are hardly in a position to say it, even if it needs saying. You have to leave that to someone else to say. Which is OK.
Having said that, I sincerely believe you are a major asset to TOD and hope you will not fade away due to the demands of your new position.
LOL! You have no idea how far off base you are. I am well aware of my faults, but one of them is not doling out false praise or sucking up to the boss. I speak my mind, and if I give a compliment people know it is sincere. At my former company, our VP of Technology once had a discussion with me, and he said I could be in his position some day, but I have to learn to play politics a bit more. He told me I am too straight-forward with my opinions, and that this isn't always the best approach. I told him I detest politics, and I believe in saying what's on my mind. He smiled and said "Well, you will never be a VP."
Furthermore, check the domains sometime via the Sitemeter to see if any oil company domains show up. I haven't even looked, but I bet visits are extremely rare. Within my company, do you know how many times I have heard the topic of Peak Oil come up? Only when I have brought it up. It is akin to talking about UFOs. So the odds that my future boss (who is not even the guy I was referring to; the person I referred to is a friend, not my future boss) is visiting TOD are pretty slim. You have better odds of being struck by lightning today.
To be honest, it is not of great significance to me what you swallow or don't swallow. It is not possible to please everyone. Some on here know me personally. They know what I am about. That's good enough for me.
I want you to use less oil. Period. But I don't want you to stop using my company's product if you are just going to use XOM's product instead.
I don't talk about company-sensitive issues, and I don't criticize my company in public. There are things that I would rather not see us involved in, but those issues are communicated and discussed internally. Now, I have no problem criticizing XOM or Shell, but I won't criticize them for doing something my own company is doing. I have also never said in this forum who I actually work for, although many do know. My testimony at the Montana legislature - which identified both me and my employer - is in the public record, and a lot of people figured this out a long time ago. It's not that I have any problem with people knowing who I work for, as long as they understand that my views in no way should be assumed to reflect the views of my company. Sometimes they probably do (on grain ethanol) and other times they certainly do not (on gas taxes).
Now, I only explain myself about once a day, and that's my quota for the day. Actually, to be honest I did it another time by e-mail today, so I will skip doing it tomorrow.