We need your talent in renewables, not in discovering yet more CO2 producing oil.

It was a tough call, and I will elaborate a bit. If Kergy had moved faster, things might be different. As it was, it took them a while to get in touch after Khosla's inquiry. By the time they did, I had already accepted the other offer.

As a result of my blogging, I have gotten at least 20 job offers or inquiries over the past year or so. Many of them were in California, and many of them were to run or build ethanol plants. In no case was the situation attractive enough to dislodge me from Montana, even for a high 6 figure income. I thanked each person for the inquiry, but told them I am happy where I am. The fact is, I and the family are very happy "where" we are. I would have had a lot more job satisfaction from working on renewables, but we wouldn't have been happy living in Silicon Valley.

The offer from Scotland has aspects the other offers didn't have. First, the location is perfect. We visited Scotland when I lived in Europe before, and decided if we ever had a chance to live there, we would go. Second, they gave me a healthy bump up the food chain to a level that most people in the organization never see. Given that a person can be stuck at my level for 15 years, and I have only been at this level for 2 years, the bump up was huge. Finally, I will be working with a Scot that I worked with a couple of years ago. He is a man with a passion for his job, and his enthusiasm is contagious. I loved working with him. Put all those aspects together and it was a perfect situation.

True, the job is in oil production instead of renewables. But make no mistake, we still need oil production. I believe we need to wean ourselves and get by with less oil. I believe in the reality of Global Warming, and I believe we need to get off of fossil fuels completely ASAP. But we can't do it cold turkey, because there just isn't a replacement ready without accepting a massive population reduction. So, we need time, and I don't think even the staunchest alternative energy advocate would deny that right now we need oil. Those were the factors that weighed into my decision, but it was still hard for me to break the news to Kergy.

As a result of my blogging, I have gotten at least 20 job offers or inquiries over the past year or so. Many of them were in California, and many of them were to run or build ethanol plants.

Here is an example, received just about 15 minutes ago, of the kind of inquiries I see on a weekly basis. I only deleted the name, area, e-mail address, and phone number:

As a fellow chemical engineer and business man, in my search for Bio Butanol technology, I came across you blogg and essays. I am based in [deleted] metro area and would like to talk to regarding any pilot plant work/scale up production plant design and production economics for the Bio Butanol manufacturing that is available under an NDA for evaluation. I am applying for a grant/ loan guarantee for commercialization Bio Butanol.

Please let me know of your interest and what number I can reach you. Thanks.

I have certainly seen some that piqued my interest, but none that were attractive enough to dislodge me until the offer from Scotland.

Further to my comments about the new job, one thing that I will be absolutely passionate about in doing projects is energy efficiency. That has always been important to me, and every unit I have ever been associated with saw an increase in energy efficiency during my tenure. So it is my hope that some of these projects that come online will do so with a higher level of energy efficiency than they otherwise might.


To Robert Rapier,

First, Congrats, and best of luck in Scotland, anyone who can't understand the allure of that place either hasn't thought about it, or is jealous! :-)

On the Bio Butanol work of yours I have read, it certainly got my interest up and I am still studying it like mad!  It has all the right requirements to me, being high up the Hydrogen/Carbon balance ladder, that is to say, mostly hydrogen, and shows signs of being economical to produce, and able to make use of much infrastructure as it exists.

My current leanings run to this....a fuel of the type of your Bio Butanol providing heat for a Stirling cycle engine to be used in CHP (Combined Heat and Power) units, stored onsite like propane...also use as the prime mover fuel in hybrids comes to mind...:-)

I think it wins out for now over Cellulosic Ethanol, and could even be a better alternative in many ways than Bio Diesel for selected markets.

Man, there is a lot of work still left to do in the next decade or two, isn't there?

Don't forget, once your settled in, your promise to get back "on post" with us poor folks!

Roger Conner  known to you as ThatsItImout

On the Bio Butanol work of yours I have read, it certainly got my interest up and I am still studying it like mad!

I probably get more inquiries on this than on any other topic. I would encourage folks to check out:

www.butanol.com

They have some good information there, and are working to promote bio-butanol.

Don't forget, once your settled in, your promise to get back "on post" with us poor folks!

It's going to be off and on for a while. I will be able to post a lot some days, and other times I will probably disappear for a week or more. Just wanted to let people know, especially if they e-mail and I don't answer.

As a result of my blogging, I have gotten at least 20 job offers or inquiries over the past year or so.

Is this what happened to Stuart as well?  Or did he get tired of the topic?

I have never heard a completely straight answer on this either. I think he is just pursuing some consulting, but he may have also gotten tired of the subject.
Hi Robert,

Thanks for your clarifications. About working with someone you respect and who is passionate, I agree, that can make all the difference in the world.

Maybe you'll consider getting back into renewables once you've made your fortune? Maybe Kergy will let you telecommute? (from Scotland!). We can only hope. Best wishes.

It never hurts to praise your new boss on a public website, as I'm sure you know there is a a good chance that he'll see it and be pleased. It's so important to get off to a good start with a new position.  

You appear to be perfectly suited for a fine career in the Big Oil corporate world, but don't expect all of us to automatically swallow your claim to objectivity and impartiality.

I do believe you are sincerely interested in energy conservation, but would you be willing to state here out in the open that you work for such-and-such oil company and that you'd like all of us to use less of your company's product?

Corporate people, particularly engineers, generally have a hard time realizing the inherent conflict in publically commenting on issues that affect the company that provides their living.   I know - because I've been there myself, in the environmental rather than the energy field. I will state flat out that if a company is paying your salary, you cannot in good conscious publically say anything negative about said company (if you want to keep your job). There is a lot to be critical about the oil industry, but you are hardly in a position to say it, even if it needs saying. You have to leave that to someone else to say. Which is OK.

Having said that, I sincerely believe you are a major asset to TOD and hope you will not fade away due to the demands of your new position.

It never hurts to praise your new boss on a public website, as I'm sure you know there is a a good chance that he'll see it and be pleased. It's so important to get off to a good start with a new position.
 

LOL! You have no idea how far off base you are. I am well aware of my faults, but one of them is not doling out false praise or sucking up to the boss. I speak my mind, and if I give a compliment people know it is sincere. At my former company, our VP of Technology once had a discussion with me, and he said I could be in his position some day, but I have to learn to play politics a bit more. He told me I am too straight-forward with my opinions, and that this isn't always the best approach. I told him I detest politics, and I believe in saying what's on my mind. He smiled and said "Well, you will never be a VP."

Furthermore, check the domains sometime via the Sitemeter to see if any oil company domains show up. I haven't even looked, but I bet visits are extremely rare. Within my company, do you know how many times I have heard the topic of Peak Oil come up? Only when I have brought it up. It is akin to talking about UFOs. So the odds that my future boss (who is not even the guy I was referring to; the person I referred to is a friend, not my future boss) is visiting TOD are pretty slim. You have better odds of being struck by lightning today.

You appear to be perfectly suited for a fine career in the Big Oil corporate world, but don't expect all of us to automatically swallow your claim to objectivity and impartiality.
 

To be honest, it is not of great significance to me what you swallow or don't swallow. It is not possible to please everyone. Some on here know me personally. They know what I am about. That's good enough for me.

I do believe you are sincerely interested in energy conservation, but would you be willing to state here out in the open that you work for such-and-such oil company and that you'd like all of us to use less of your company's product?
 

I want you to use less oil. Period. But I don't want you to stop using my company's product if you are just going to use XOM's product instead.

Corporate people, particularly engineers, generally have a hard time realizing the inherent conflict in publically commenting on issues that affect the company that provides their living.
 

I don't talk about company-sensitive issues, and I don't criticize my company in public. There are things that I would rather not see us involved in, but those issues are communicated and discussed internally. Now, I have no problem criticizing XOM or Shell, but I won't criticize them for doing something my own company is doing. I have also never said in this forum who I actually work for, although many do know. My testimony at the Montana legislature - which identified both me and my employer - is in the public record, and a lot of people figured this out a long time ago. It's not that I have any problem with people knowing who I work for, as long as they understand that my views in no way should be assumed to reflect the views of my company. Sometimes they probably do (on grain ethanol) and other times they certainly do not (on gas taxes).

Now, I only explain myself about once a day, and that's my quota for the day. Actually, to be honest I did it another time by e-mail today, so I will skip doing it tomorrow.