I see your bovine and raise you a food.
http://www.ashdenawards.org/media_summary06_india_arti
Its daily consumption is just 1kg of feedstock (such as waste flour, leftover food, spoilt grain, spoilt milk, over-ripe fruit, green leaves and oil cakes) as opposed to the 40kg of cow dung needed for the traditional plants. From this small amount of feedstock it produces 500 litres of gas.
(now, have better web sluths than I come up with a 'how to make this' instructions?)

These people make a claim
http://www.yeomansplow.com.au/yeomans-keyline-system.htm
http://www.yeomansplow.com.au/priority-one.htm
This book describes how we can totally stop Global Warming with its resultant cancerous climate change and restore atmospheric greenhouse gas levels to near pre-industrial level. It shows how this can be done quickly and at negligible costs.

A good way to get killed.
http://www.pterosail.com/

Finally, some battery news (hype?)
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/10/altairnano_test.html
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/10/new_nanotechnol.php

Drilling away :-)

Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)
http://www.arti-india.org/

Commercialisation of Improved Biomass Fuels and Cooking Devices in India: Scale Up PROJECT
http://www.arti-india.org/content/view/44/42/

ARTI Biogas Plant: A compact digester for producing biogas from food waste
http://www.arti-india.org/content/view/45/40/

Compact Biogas Plant - details
http://www.arti-india.org/content/view/46/43/

The battery claims from altair nanotechnology are very exciting, if true.

Why is it that, decade after decade, we are constantly tantalized with wonderful new technologies that are never heard from again? (we have a built in conspiracy generator; TPTB are constantly buying these wonder patents up and destroying them!!!!! DEATH TO TPTB!!!!        
       :-)

because the "technologies" are either fabrications or they can't be sold at a profit.

There seems to be a lot of companies out there working on new battery tech. I'm sure someone's product will be more than snake oil and end up having a combination of good power density and life expectancy to really drive electric cars as an option.

Very intriguing. If indeed it is able to process generic biomass waste, including plant waste like switch grass etc, some advantages are immediately obvious:

(1) Only C & H (as CH4 or others) are burned and released to the atmosphere. I know that in tradional (cow-manure) biogas plants solid residue is returned to the fields as fertilizer. Looks like this is possible here also. This means that
  (a) No atmospheric pollution
  (b) minized depletion of soil nutrients

(2) non-grain waste from food crops for e.g. could be used as feed-stock. Right now if plant waste is returned directly to the soil the microbes that break it up release energy directly to the enviroment, without sending it through a cooking stove first :-)

(3)) Compress the bio-gas and use it in a vehicle. In India, many cars have been modified to run on LPG (cooking gas - the stuff used on gas grills in the States) because of a lower cost/Joule.

(4) Generate electricity in a thermal cycle or directly a Fuel Cell.

The options also appear sustainable.

May come to pass as fossil fuels are taxed or run out.

odds are there is more in the mix than simple C and H.  Sulfur and poss. nitrogen gas.  Not a big issue for a cooking flame, but a real show-stopper for an ICE.
The second item of your list sounds to good to be truth. A closer look at chapter 11 - ENERGY SYSTEMS WE USE NOW AND WHAT WE MUST USE TOMORROW  shows the neglect of the thermodynamic laws and economic principles. Also not one word is mentioned on EROI issues or growth figures to implement those future renewable energy systems.

"Ethanol can replace petrol in motor vehicles
and that would end the production of greenhouse
gasses from all the cars in the world. We must
make it happen now. Ethanol is actually a cheaper
fuel when oil prices go over $45.00 a barrel.
Virtually all motor vehicles other than those
in Brazil, today run on either petrol, diesel or
LPG (liquefied petroleum gas). And they are all
fossil fuels. To stop Global Warming these fuels
have to be replaced. What is amazing is just how
incredible easy and practical it is to do so.
"

"Now in Brazil, and in any other efficient sugar
producing country, from a hectare of sugar cane
they can produce 5,500 litres of ethanol per year,
that's 35 barrels of motor fuel. On a per acre basis,
that's 14 barrels or 600 US gallons.
The total world's oil consumption is four billion
tons per year. That's two thirds of a ton of oil per
head of population. It is the equivalent of one car
for every four and a half people on the planet.
There is actually only about half that number of
transport vehicles in the world. The rest of the oil
is used for heating, petrochemical production etc.
What does this all mean? As an exercise, let's
say we drive 16,000 miles per year and get 20
miles to the US gallons, (26,000 kilometres at 12
litres per 100 k). That's about three tons of fuel
per year. Then to grow the ethanol or biodiesel
we would need to allocate two thirds of a hectare,
that's under one and a half acres per motor vehicle
That's 0.13 ha or 0.33 acres per person. That
would require an area of sugar cane farms 2,750
kilometres square or 1,700 miles square. That's
about the size of the Amazon basin and we will
have cancelled our need for petroleum derived
transport fuel."

I'm a bit more interesed in the claim

Allan calculates that a 1.6% increase of organic matter levels on the world's arable lands (8.5% of the land area) would stabilise atmospheric carbon levels.

I call BS on the 1kg making 500 liters of gas.  1 mol gas = 22.4 liters right?  even if you had a kg of H2 you would only have 11.2 liters gas.  So no chemical process can turn 1 kg into 500 liters gas sorry it does not make sense.
As you 'call bullshit', please feel free to conact these people
http://www.ashdenawards.org/media_summary06_india_arti

And tell them they need to retract their researched award because you believe it is 'bullshit'.

It has to be a typo or not enough info.  The article says 1kg daily makes 500 liters but does not say per day per month etc.  So fermentation breaks stuff down.  No additions from air like carbon to CO2.  Now there is no way 1kg of any material can become 500 liters at STP.  High school chem.

So I restate my BS with the caveat of maybe they left out per month after 500 liters or something similar.  I am interested to see the device though I would build one for 500 liters per KG just so I could break laws of physics and chemistry in my own home.

It is a typo, see here http://www.arti-india.org/content/view/45/52/. That says 500g per 2kg.

Unfortunately pretty much every press release turns useful information into gibberish, so I prefer to get the source.

Don't get me wrong I compost my organic waste...if I could capture BTU's on the way to fertilizer I would but I think household size fermenters are not feasible.  Think about it could you cook your food on your previous scraps?  You need more external inputs...yard debri manure etc.
Notice in the press release that the testimonials have people saying things like, "I get all my neighbors to give me their scraps."  Suggesting that one family's waste is not enough.  
Again I think conceptually it is great if we all managed all our waste streams 100% the world would be better off. My point is if someone tells you they can make straw into gold guard your 1st born child.  If you are producing that much ort maybe you need to plan your meals better.
That sounds about right Leanan (unless your family owns a cow or several smaller critters maybe - pool your poop?).  This is a few years old but makes an interesting point about how practical digesters would be if the corn-stover and wood-pelleters Fuel-Twitch to "Home Grown" biogas all at once:

"37. Digesters can be built in virtually any size, from a small family-sized digester (1-2 m3) producing just enough gas for cooking and lighting to a large community-sized of thousands of m3 producing sufficient gas to generate electricity.  

The technical viability of biogas technology has been repeatedly proven in many field tests and demonstration projects, but numerous problems arose as soon as mass dissemination was attempted, particularly with regard to availability of digester feedstock (animal manure and water), as well as the high investment cost (US$300-500 for 1-2 m3) ".

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:wHweFyb2GKcJ:www.uneca.org/estnet/ECA_Meetings/CSD3/RETs_Paper.d oc+household+africa+size+fermenters+natural+gas+fertilizer&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6

eric blair here's the problem I have with that biogas thingie. Supposedly all these nice Indian folk are coming up with all kinds of waste food to put into it and make it run?

Well, look, I was a kid in the 1970s. I know how much waste food comes from a poor household, and the answer is: Damn near None. I mean, we threw Nothing away! Spoiled milk? It never got a chance to spoil! Same for all the other food goodies, you gotta be kidding me, we threw like NOTHING out, and we still weren't as poor as these Indians. The idea that Indians, or us in a few decades, are going to have enough to throw away as presetn-day middle-class Americans is just silly. Look up the occasional pieces written by people who've gone to live in India or come from India to here - nothing is wasted there and present-day Americans' waste is obscene.

That article sounds like a come-on for investment someone's set up, kinda like the "free energy for life" hoax that's gone around the US, you send 'em a buncha money and they sell you their free-energy device and the "rights" to install 'em around your 'hood....

That article sounds like a come-on for investment someone's set up, kinda like the "free energy for life" hoax that's gone around the US, you send 'em a buncha money and they sell you their free-energy device and the "rights" to install 'em around your 'hood....

If I went to their office for r 100 ruppies I could get a CD.  For 200 ruppies, they'd mail me the CD.  

Rather cheap...and if I can use the 800 lbs of organic waste stream (used brewing grain) I already have.....