71 comments on DrumBeat: October 4, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
71 comments on DrumBeat: October 4, 2006
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Data always beats theories. 'Look at data three times and then come to a conclusion,' versus 'coming to a conclusion and searching for
some data.' The former will win every time.”
—Matthew Simmons, ASPO-USA conference, Boston, MA, October 26, 2006
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Having worked for a very well-known management consulting firm about a 100 years ago, I think it is not too much of an exaggeration to describe them as intellectual massage parlors, a chief purpose of which is to make the client feel good about what he is already doing while at the same time giving him the illusion that he is participating in a rigorous objective analysis. It's not easy to pull this off, and Yergin et al are world-class masters of this art.
They've got a bunch of tin ears there.
As for the CERA report...I actually thought it was remarkably pessimistic. For them, I mean.
It was changed due to cultural sensitivites. Only Allah is capable of infinite justice. One interesting quote from this source (Naval War College Review, Autumn 2002, Vol. LV, No. 4) says,
On another topic, I'm reviewing a PO novel for an old friend. You would appreciate his treatment (albeit only one scenario among many possible) of how our very complex, JIT system might unravel when the BTU's / day drop below some critical threshold.
What is that threshold? How severe will the positive feedback be as one broken economic connection (JIT gloabl parts delivery to a small business, e.g.) causes 2 or more new ruptures, and so on? Will it look like a slumping process (slow) or a brittle fracturing event (rapid)?
I suppose that the answer to the last is based on one's vantage point. Also, I'm convinced by WT that the depltion rate, as measured by net exports, will have a strong bearing on the rate of de-complexification (sheesh, what a word!).
Ed
I know. Like I said, a bunch of tin ears. At the very least, you'd think they'd have someone research it before rolling it out.
And remember Dubya announcing his "crusade"? Oy.
I probably would. I do think that failure, when it comes, will be of the systemic variety.
Like Scotty said, "The more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain."
Oh! I'm just goofin' - Pretty Boy.
Either I wasn't clear enough, or you take me too literally. The message I was trying to convey is that the naming of Yergin's three energy scenarios is just as BAD as the Pentagon's naming of it's various operations in Iraq and Afganistan. For some time now, I've been quite amused (and disturbed) by how surreal these names have become.
Someone once said:
"Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it."
RE: "Yergin et al are world-class masters of this art"
John Locke (1632-1704):
"How many men have no other ground for their tenets than the supposed honesty or learning, or number of those of the same profession? As if honest or bookish men could not err, or truth were to be established by vote of the multitude; yet this with most men serves the turn. If we could but see the secret motives that influenced the men of name and learning in the world, we should not always find that it was the embracing of truth for its own sake that made them espouse the doctrines they owned and maintained."