no. it will be worse.
let me give you a example, during the great new york blizzard at bars milk was served more often then bear. not because the milk would spoil. but because it became a status symbol to those who could afford it after the price spike. people bought it simply to have a glass of it, to tell people around them that they can afford it.
this will happen with gas, the more the price rises the more people who can afford it will use it because the more it will become a status symbol.
opps i mean beer
Solid gold bathroom fixtures are a status symbol too ... but the desire doesn't seem to bring us down to ... a collapse in bathroom plumging(?).
get back to me when you find out how they got that gold and to what ends one must go now to get it compared to the good old days of finding it in a river bed.
You know I thought I might have to explain my sense of humor here too.  When you gave me that milk example I thought it was funny to respond with a gold example.  Tit-for-tat.  Even Steven.

Of course the joke is that neither one really means anything.  They are both stupid point cases in a broader (and "uncollapsed") economy.

Now I'm boggled that you want to continue down to ... river beds?  You are a long way afield from the original question.

My comment:

Sure, we are unlikely to powerdown when gasoline is around two bucks a gallon.  You tell me, would our commitment really be exactly the same when gasoline is ten, or twenty bucks for the same gallon?