Khebab, great post again. You always have the real goods.
One slight inaccuracy-Cuba now has some production.

Ouestion: What are Type 1 countries?

Also, why is bitumen production from tar sands included in oil rather than have a separate category? My personal definition of oil is that oil has to flow naturally at 70 degrees farenheight. Since tar has to be either heated ir hydrogenated to flow and costs so much more to produce and refine, shouldn't it be considered either alternative energy like syncrude from coal or perhaps have its own category or one including bitumen from shale too. I think its really just noise on your figures.  

Type 1 depletion is defined in the Chris Sebrowski article.

I quote :


Type I depletion - is the normal loss of capacity in an oil field as production from wells in one field run down and are offset by new wells or increased production from other existing wells in the field.

I join everybody in the many thanks to Khebab for this data.

The production numbers are probably inaccurate for small countries.

Ouestion: What are Type 1 countries?

Type I is when an oil field is in decline so all the countries are in fact type I. Type II is when the decline is not showing up on the country total production.

About tar sands, I believe that it should be included (and modeled) as a separated category. Also, the syncrude production  figures should be used, not the raw bitumen which is not the final product (there is 10-20% loss in the upgrading process).

Also, I've heard Aspect Petroleum has found an excellent field in Belieze,through industry sources. But both countries are I'm sure very minor additions to world production.
85 MMbd - (annual decline) + Excellent = ???

Excellent isn't a number.

You need to use the da Vinci code.
Cuba: Some information here and here, with production apparently at 0.07 mbpd in 2004 and possibly growing.