I was trying to 'cut through' the fog in a sense.  The one piece of good data we have on oil is the price.

It seems as if oil consumption is still rising, inventories are static, therefore supply is still rising.  And, indeed, prices have fallen back.

You can tell a commodity is exhausting, if the price rises.  For a long time, the real price of oil fell (1).  It has now in some sense 'caught up' to where it might be (on a long term growth track).

(1) my own theory on that is that for a long time, OPEC was able to hold the price of oil higher than market forces would have let it.  OPEC is a profit maximising oligopolist, and therefore reduces the quantity of its commodity supplied below the free market level (and secures a higher revenue for its efforts).

And there were genuine efforts to conserve energy (not so much in the USA post CAFE, but in Europe with high gasoline taxes, encouragement of diesel cars etc.-- and businesses worldwide sought to reduce their vulnerability to oil price swings).  So you had less demand than market forces would have dictated, and at the same time 'held back' supply.

Eventually that played out as the oil price collapse of the late 90s.  But in the 2000s the rise of China and India, plus continued growth in US oil consumption, has 'eaten up' the slack capacity in the system.

"It seems as if oil consumption is still rising, inventories are static, therefore supply is still rising.  And, indeed, prices have fallen back."

The oil traders, who have a big influence on the day-to-day price, seem to react to the "inventories".  But I think those inventories are vastly over-rated.  They are only a few days, perhaps 2 weeks, of supply.  And they're not a lot higher than they were - the "increase" is what, less than one day's supply?  Drawdown form tank farms in KSA and Europe can easily explain the commercial "inventories" in the USA.  Meanwhile the SPR is lower than it was (pre-Katrina).

Also, like WT says, the bidding war for oil happens in spurts.  So the "demand destruction" in poorer countries brings a temporary bit of "relief" to the richer countries, until the next round of bidding.  It's a "musical chairs" game and the chairs are slowly disappearing even if some fat asses are still sitting.

Anyway, I am not saying that the price signal is perfect.  Not at all -- that is why Peak Oil is so difficult to tackle.  The Market is mostly blind, until near the end.  The current visibility of some price signal is thus a sign, although uncertain, of imminent peak.

Finally, I don't think that "peak" is the important point in time.  Supply can fall behind demand even before the peak.  You would expect it to, since the supply curve flattens out as you near the peak, and the demand curve is still rising, even faster (e.g. China).  With the globalized economy dependent on "growth" that's catastrophic.  Moreover, worldwide per capita oil peaked in 1979, thus any "growth" since has been due to increasing inequity.

Supply and demand are always exactly in balance, +/- changes in inventories.  That is an accounting identity: it is definitional.

The supply of oil exactly equals the demand for oil, plus or minus any change in inventory.

And most oil changes hands at the market price.

When you say 'supply can fall behind demand even before the peak' that is actually logically impossible (except for changes in inventories).

I'm not aware of evidence that total world oil consumption has fallen, so if there is 'demand destruction' it's not evident in the aggregate.  That (the quantity of oil demanded) would be a higher quality statistic than total oil produced.

The fall in oil per capita isn't particularly concerning.  Merely a sign that the world has gotten better at generating GDP, per barrel of oil consumed.  (It also uses less copper per unit of GDP than it did in 1979).

If we look at some other measures like life span and average life expectancy, or number of mobile phones in the world (1979: people connected to a phone system of any kind), proportion of people who are starving, etc. then the world is a richer place than 1979 (with the striking exception of sub-Saharan Africa, where AIDS has taken a horrific toll).

Where there is room for concern is in total pollution and in other measures of ecosystem degradation.  The capacity of the Earth to handle our polluting output is finite (albeit elastic).