64 comments on Investment in Oil Exploration and Production -- An "Above Ground" Factor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
64 comments on Investment in Oil Exploration and Production -- An "Above Ground" Factor
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Most people spend more time and energy going around problems than in trying to solve them.”
—Henry Ford
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I'm a bit confused by this statement. Over a 5 year span, a 70% increase to $340 billion means that we invested only $200 billion in 2000. Assuming a 5% inflation rate for the industry, I come up with this:
2000 = $200.0
2001 = $210.0
2002 = $220.5
2003 = $231.5
2004 = $243.1
2005 = $255.3
340 / 255.3 = 33% increase
In order for this statement to be correct, and net investment to only increase by 5%, the global inflation rate would have to be at a rate that increases investment to $324 billion. This rate would have to be around 10%.
Does anyone here really think the global oil industry inflation rate is 10% annually? That would make it something like 2.5x the global inflation rate.
Scarity has bid up a limited supply (in some cases dramatically) and even the raw materials used (steel & oil products are two largest) have gone up substantially.
Alan
How to calculate a percentage of increase using simple mathematics.
A = Last measurement
B = increase
C = Percent of increase
A-B/A = C
(A-B/A)*A = C*A
A-B = C*A
-B = C*A-A
If we replace with actual numbers we get
-B = 0.70 * 340 - 340
-B = -102
B = 102
That's the increase of 70% in 5 years. Starting year would then be 340-102 = $238 billion. Using that REAL starting number, see what we get with an increase of 5% each year.
2000 = 238
2001 = 249.9
2002 = 262.4
2003 = 275.5
2004 = 289.27
2005 = 303.73
Well, that wasnt enough. What about 7%, lets see :
2000 = 238
2001 = 254.66
2002 = 272.49
2003 = 297.20
2004 = 318
2005 = 340
Actual yearly increase should have been 7%, that pretty near real inflation rate as stated by shadowstatistic web site.
If you make an argument about some calculation (any) be sure to have enough mathematical literacy.
I had a physics teacher that was always saying that before pointing at the straw in the eye of others, someone should first notice the wooden beam that's in his.
In some sectors, Personnel rates have almost doubled.
Rig rates have never been higher.
This significantly impacts on Operator costs and an operators ability to get things done even with the higher Capex for Exp. and Appraisal drilling.
Simmons's presentations of late keep coming back to this issue.