![]() | The architecture of UK offshore oil production in relation to future production models | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: December 1, 2006 | ![]() |
![]() | The architecture of UK offshore oil production in relation to future production models | The Oil Drum: Europe | EuroNews: November 29, 2006 | ![]() |
79 comments on USGS WPA 2000 part 1 - A look at expected oil discoveries
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
79 comments on USGS WPA 2000 part 1 - A look at expected oil discoveries
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
USGS estimates 800 billion barrels remain to be discovered betweeen now and 2030.
This is approxiamtely 32 billion barrels per year on average.
Global comnsumption is also (currently) approximately 32 billion barrels per year
Globally we have NOT managed to discover more oil than we have consumed for one single year in the past twenty years.
Why should we believe or expect new oil discoveries to break the trend of two decades?
(This does not even examine the fact that many reserve "discoveries" in the mid 1980's were bogus additions to reserves made by OPEC members for export quota purposes - as we have seen in the IHS/CERA documentation of Kuwait..... thus NOT to be relied upon)
Further, if we look at the four main providers of URR estimates, URR has grown since Y@K at 113-Gb/yr. And with new $50-plus pricing of oil, the 2006 revisions to URR are massive, with the fires estimate of over 5-Tb Ultimate in the past month.
Oil did not drop $20 bucks by accident. There is currently almost 2-mbd of over-supply in the system. That is why are seeing massive cut backs ... to preserve the PRICE. Some here will see the softer production figures in Q4 & 2007Q1 as delightful proof that there PEAK has finally come (again). But like the 8 downward corrections since 1975, this one too shall pass as the market adjusts.
Reserves will be part II later, and glad to see you freely admit that the USGS blew it on estimated discoveries. What do your studies indicate for potential discoveries going forward in barrels/day, geo-areas, and on-stream production times? How much do you differ from the USGS and CERA in
discoveries onlyplease?Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Yes of course. Geologists have been trying for decades to explain this strange phenomenon. It was noticed almost a century ago that after the first well penetrates a reservoir, the reservoir begins to grow. At first everyone thought it might have been "oil multiplying bacteria" causing the reserve to grow. It was thought that the drilling bit caused the bacterial contamination.
Then other theories were put forth. Some thought that relieving the pressure in the well caused oil to push up from below, filling the spaces left by the oil pumped out.
But then a few years ago someone threw a monkey wrench in the works. Shell pointed out that occasionally reservoirs shrink instead of growing. Their reserves shrank, in a single year, by 20 percent. And it is rumored that Kuwait's reserves have shrunk by 50 percent. And there is fear throughout the Middle East that reserves in that area are about to shrink by at least 50 percent, perhaps by as much as 65 percent.
But the reasons why reserves sometimes grow and sometimes shrink is still one of the greatest mysteries of geology.
Ron Patterson
What is going on with you? There's fear in Hollywood that revenues will shrink by 50% this year. I've had nightmares where I feared my penis shrinking by 50%. Luckily at 11 inches I don't have much to worry about.
Can we get back to some realistic issues with verifiable data and calm approach. Please.
Sincerely,
Henry Kissinger
Please take a European vacation, where you will be arrested as a war criminal.
TIA
Rat
I've always been the premier voice on this stance here. Not even oldhippie has proved very convincing.
My views here are based on Hitchens. And I'm sorry, but I disagree with Hitch on this one.
And I can. Cuz I'm the only one reads him.
Hello?
Probably much more than that, because over the last 20+ years, ME reserves didn't decline despite all those billions of barrels extracted.
I agree that there is some excess capacity, but where did you get the 2 mbd number? I have guessed at 1 or 2 mbpd, but that is based on extrapolations from areas that I know have excess capacity.
You don't wanna be Freddy's friend. You don't understand the relationships. You're still just a kid when it comes to TOD. Crossing the Freddy line is gonna cause you trouble. Freddy's great. And he's right.
But you don't need that involvement in your life right now.
Looking out for you,
Oil CEO
(Ughh! I've failed. This is worse than Kissinger Brezhnev. How could I have let this happen?)
Q1 0.4-mbd surplus
Q2 1.9-mbd surplus
Q3 1.8-mbd surplus
What I'll bet you is that "the optimists" get completely wrong footed by believing reserves growth will go on for ever - because of course when you start from a position of understatement - either by accident or by design, and grow your reserves annualy on the back of this, you do eventually reach a point where stated reserves equal actual - and any further increases become unwarranted.
I'm hoping to persuade some of our new contributors here to look at the reserves growth history of the 5 super majors - was wondering if you might already have done that?
I agree with you about current over supply, soft demand and peak lying in the future - but the more I look, the harder I find it to see growing production beyond 15 Nov 2011.