An easy way for the uninformed general public to evaluate this information:

USGS estimates 800 billion barrels remain to be discovered betweeen now and 2030.

This is approxiamtely 32 billion barrels per year on average.

Global comnsumption is also (currently) approximately 32 billion barrels per year

Globally we have NOT managed to discover more oil than we have consumed for one single year in the past twenty years.

Why should we believe or expect new oil discoveries to break the trend of two decades?

(This does not even examine the fact that many reserve "discoveries" in the mid 1980's were bogus additions to reserves made by OPEC members for export quota purposes - as we have seen in the IHS/CERA documentation of Kuwait..... thus NOT to be relied upon)

Not so, Bunyan.  With respect to Rembrandt, looking at discoveries is only half the picture.  Please remember the realities of Reserve Growth.  There, USGS has drastically underestimated.  Due to the combination of Reserve Growth & Discoveries, their URR has risen from 3.1-Tb in Y2K to 3.797-Tb at the end of 2004.  If we consider they collaborate with EIA, it was 4.005-Tb on New Years Day.

Further, if we look at the four main providers of URR estimates, URR has grown since Y@K at 113-Gb/yr.  And with new $50-plus pricing of oil, the 2006 revisions to URR are massive, with the fires estimate of over 5-Tb Ultimate in the past month.

Oil did not drop $20 bucks by accident.  There is currently almost 2-mbd of over-supply in the system.  That is why are seeing massive cut backs ... to preserve the PRICE.  Some here will see the softer production figures in Q4 & 2007Q1 as delightful proof that there PEAK has finally come (again).  But like the 8 downward corrections since 1975, this one too shall pass as the market adjusts.

Hello Freddy Hutter,

Reserves will be part II later, and glad to see you freely admit that the USGS blew it on estimated discoveries.  What do your studies indicate for potential discoveries going forward in barrels/day, geo-areas, and on-stream production times?  How much do you differ from the USGS and CERA in discoveries only please?

Bob Shaw in Phx,Az  Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?

Freddy Hutter wrote:

Please remember the realities of Reserve Growth.

Yes of course. Geologists have been trying for decades to explain this strange phenomenon. It was noticed almost a century ago that after the first well penetrates a reservoir, the reservoir begins to grow. At first everyone thought it might have been "oil multiplying bacteria" causing the reserve to grow. It was thought that the drilling bit caused the bacterial contamination.

Then other theories were put forth. Some thought that relieving the pressure in the well caused oil to push up from below, filling the spaces left by the oil pumped out.

But then a few years ago someone threw a monkey wrench in the works. Shell pointed out that occasionally reservoirs shrink instead of growing. Their reserves shrank, in a single year, by 20 percent. And it is rumored that Kuwait's reserves have shrunk by 50 percent. And there is fear throughout the Middle East that reserves in that area are about to shrink by at least 50 percent, perhaps by as much as 65 percent.

But the reasons why reserves sometimes grow and sometimes shrink is still one of the greatest mysteries of geology.

Ron Patterson

Or perhaps it is one of the greatest mysteries of polity.
Ron,

What is going on with you? There's fear in Hollywood that revenues will shrink by 50% this year. I've had nightmares where I feared my penis shrinking by 50%. Luckily at 11 inches I don't have much to worry about.

Can we get back to some realistic issues with verifiable data and calm approach. Please.

Sincerely,
Henry Kissinger

Dear Henry:
  Please take a European vacation, where you will be arrested as a war criminal.
 TIA

Rat

Ehh? I don't know, Rat.

I've always been the premier voice on this stance here. Not even oldhippie has proved very convincing.

My views here are based on Hitchens. And I'm sorry, but I disagree with Hitch on this one.

And I can. Cuz I'm the only one reads him.

Hello?

I have never had that nightmare, my nightmares having something so large it becomes useless, but then my life involves hope while your life I'm afraid involves fear.
Unfortunately the first to your post was mine. Two days later. Mine clearly wasn't funny. It only drew your response. You got no response. Conclusion. My prick is way bigger than yours. Try again. Dipchip is a good name.
>And there is fear throughout the Middle East that reserves in that area are about to shrink by at least 50 percent, perhaps by as much as 65 percent.

Probably much more than that, because over the last 20+ years, ME reserves didn't decline despite all those billions of barrels extracted.

There is currently almost 2-mbd of over-supply in the system.

I agree that there is some excess capacity, but where did you get the 2 mbd number? I have guessed at 1 or 2 mbpd, but that is based on extrapolations from areas that I know have excess capacity.

Bad question. Or poorly phrased. He got it the same place you did. Can be simply margin of error.

You don't wanna be Freddy's friend. You don't understand the relationships. You're still just a kid when it comes to TOD. Crossing the Freddy line is gonna cause you trouble. Freddy's great. And he's right.

But you don't need that involvement in your life right now.

Looking out for you,
Oil CEO

(Ughh! I've failed. This is worse than Kissinger Brezhnev. How could I have let this happen?)

Taken from our monthly USA reserves & global extraction report (via IEA):
Q1 0.4-mbd surplus
Q2 1.9-mbd surplus
Q3 1.8-mbd surplus
I think there's a decent chance you are going to be right, Freddy. Once again, you demonstrate your mastery of history.
Freddy - reserves growth is a very interesting phenomenon and I think it needs to be looked at in some great detail from political, fiscal and technical angles.

What I'll bet you is that "the optimists" get completely wrong footed by believing reserves growth will go on for ever - because of course when you start from a position of understatement - either by accident or by design, and grow your reserves annualy on the back of this, you do eventually reach a point where stated reserves equal actual - and any further increases become unwarranted.

I'm hoping to persuade some of our new contributors here to look at the reserves growth history of the 5 super majors - was wondering if you might already have done that?

I agree with you about current over supply, soft demand and peak lying in the future - but the more I look, the harder I find it to see growing production beyond 15 Nov 2011.

Yup, but not limited to reserve growth.  This new graph will be part of next version release of our Depletion Scenarios.