The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: November 8, 2006

313 comments on DrumBeat: November 8, 2006

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version

MillMan on November 8, 2006 - 2:26pm

Khosla and his ethanol connections are the reason I voted against it. Normally this is the kind of measure I would be desperate to vote yes on. It was simply a poor proposition, and that is too bad, especially in light of the the road infrastructure measures that did pass. Ugh.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

brutus on November 8, 2006 - 2:43pm

I ended up voting for 87, just so it wouldnt lose so bad. But you're right CA voted down a badly drawn proposition on alternative fuels for 4 billion and approved spending, after the costs of the bonds, another 60 billion for roads, an even bigger waste of money. Not a good day, but our politics isnt being honest, but its not honest about much these days.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

313 comments on DrumBeat: November 8, 2006

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Show without comments | PDF version

Search The Oil Drum with Google

Support The Oil Drum

Click the button to learn about supporting The Oil Drum with a secure donation.

Peak Oil Primers

Beware email scams!

Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.

“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”

—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)