<EIA: Annual Energy Outlook 2006 The Oil Drum Why the US Political System Is Unable to React to Peak Oil: Institutions>

38 comments on Speaking of bumpy plateaus

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

kramsauer on February 15, 2006 - 10:21pm Permalink | Subthread | Comments top
What's the lead time on new projects?  Just because the near-term (near-month future or spot) price jumps doesn't mean the assumed planning price (the internal "price deck") changes at all.

One other thing you don't capture is Exxon's status as a "baseline producer."  It is the marginal producers that increase production in response to pricing changes, and based on the ramp up of the Canadian oil sands (a whole colony of marginal producers) and the money spent on production enhancement technologies (fracing and pumping), pricing does have some impact on supply.

Oil is relatively inelastic, I'd imagine (especially at high prices where all marginal fields are profitable), but it isn't as cut and dry as you portray with your simplistic charts.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Stuart Staniford on February 15, 2006 - 11:30pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
The response time for new projects is anywhere from 2-6 years (or more) depending on the complexity of the project (a simple tie-back to an existing platform, versus a major new development in an area with little infrastructure). So there's been time for a response to show up.

The EIA appears to believe that US oil production would have at least some elasticity (they show substantially different production profiles based on price). Of course Exxon is only one data point, but as either the largest or second largest of the oil majors, and a highly diversified one, they are exposed to a significant cross-section of the industry, so that the fact that they cannot (or won't) increase production is significant. Most of the other majors are actually in decline:

The main exception, BP, has primarily been benefiting from significant exposure to a Russian subsidiary.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Stuart Staniford on February 15, 2006 - 11:56pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I should add that their annual reports generally show an intent to increase production. Eg. spot checking Exxon's 2001 and 2004 reports, in 2001 they intended to grow production by around 3% annually, and in 2004 they intended to grow at about 3 1/2% a year to 2007. However, it doesn't seem to pan out that way.

Here's their exploration spending from the 2004 annual report. Doesn't look like we should expect a fundamental change in the next few years.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Oil CEO on February 16, 2006 - 4:08am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I'd love to see this an Excel 'Area'-type chart with 100% area including these OIC numbers as a percentage of the total liquids daily production for the same period.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.

38 comments on Speaking of bumpy plateaus

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version