![]() | Some updates on Europe and a small puzzle | The Oil Drum | UK's Guardian: Are Capitalism and a Habitable Planet Mutually Exclusive? | ![]() |
66 comments on Friday Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
66 comments on Friday Open Thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race.”
—H. G. Wells, 1904
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I must admit I don't know what are the fundamental differences between blogs and forums that require such restriction. I'm writing in a hurry sometimes as a take-away from work, and therefore the mistakes which I suspect are pretty annoying to the public here (being highly educated in general). Overall IMO, the confusion element from typos, factual errors etc. is higher than it would be if they could be corrected right away from the commenters instead of posting a "correction" post.
Of course I grant the editors the right to have a final word on such questions, but still hope they change their minds...
Reader A makes a comment. Reader B then responds. Then reader A modifies his original comment such that Reader B's response makes no sense. Confusing, and not very fair to Reader B, yes?
I'll try to be more careful and use the preview button.
(semi-serious)
Forums have addressed this for years. Forums simply date/time stamp the post and add a line (automated, cannot be changed by the author) showing that they edited the post and when.
So you have this:
After editing, it becomes this:
Now reading a thread, I can see if someone has modified the thread and therefore understand that I am not looking at the original post. Further, forums often allow "quoting" which automatically copies the original post precisely so that a reply can be compared directly against the post. Such a quote cannot be edited, and thus demonstrates the difference between what is currently posted and what was originally posted.
In that sense, blogs are a step backwards when used as community platforms for communications. As expressions for a single individual or even a few individuals, they work very well. What has occurred here at TOD is the evolution of the blog into a wider community of posters. Perhaps one solution would be to install a forum and disallow further direct comments to the blog except by the TOD team itself. Then community participants (like us) could comment on a thread in the appropriate forum opened by the original poster and which would have a link back to the blog entry.
If editing left the original text, but allowed strikeouts and bold or red-colored revisions, that would be fine. But I doubt those features are available, and enforceable, in this software.
But most blogs don't bother, probably because unlike message boards, they are ephemeral. Once a blog entry drops down the list or scrolls off the front page, few will see it, let alone reply to it. While a PHP board like PeakOil.com has some discussions that have been going for years. It just seems like it's not worth the hassle of adding editing capabilities, given that most blog threats have such short half-lives anyway.