Re:  Total Liquids & Crude Oil Inventory Numbers

These two items have bothered me mightily for a long time.

First, in regard to total liquids, I never thought it made much sense.  I always thought that the crude + condensate numbers make a lot more sense, primarily because large volumes of NGL's come from natural gas reservoirs (also true for condensates, but less of a factor).    Also, you get distortions from refinery gains, especially here in the US.

Second, in regard to crude oil inventory numbers, they don't differentiate on the basis of quality.  A barrel of very heavy, less than 20 Degree API gravity, crude with a high sulfur content is counted the same as a barrel of 40 Degree API gravity light, sweet crude.   As Matt Simmons said, it's like counting a rusted out 1960 Plymouth the same as a 2005 Rolls Royce.  I think that it is quite likely--especially in light of the spread between heavy, sour and light, sweet crude--that growing inventories of heavy, sour are obscuring flat to falling inventories of light, sweet crude.

Yes, I'm also concerned about the shift in quality, especailly since I've learned, right here at TOD, that light sweet crude did peak in 2004?

As for the CNN outlet, it was pretty much along the usual line:
there is a problem (in this case:"huricane" & "terrorists")
they explain we need oil for mobility(i.e. the "economy")
there are "other" things to power mobility(like Hydrogen, )
problem solved!

There IS a problem (Peak Oil & Overpopulation)
We need oil, for FOOD ( i.e. to live comfortably)
There are other foodsources (like other people. Problem solved)

"You don't want to go there" (Mr. Simmons, as in CNN's " We were warned")