68 comments on More on the Military concerns
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
68 comments on More on the Military concerns
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.”
—Theodore Roosevelt
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I think more accurately it is: "Al-Jazeera is often a reliable source, but has a point of view that sometimes colors it's stories." The "massacre" at Jenin springs to mind.
This coal to oil story for the military is one to watch unfold over the next few years.
75% of commercial network television time is purchased by the top 100 corporations in the U.S.
To more fully understand the relevance of the statistic Mander adds: there are about 450,000 corporations in the country.
Mander's conclusion is that 100 corporations decide what appears on television and what does not.
The most important conclusion is that producers must ultimately sell their programs to sponsors, that this is an explicit understanding which guides all program content and how the message is presented.
That Public Broadcasting is more that 50% funded by these same corporations which leads to the same programming constraints.
That the cost of an ad or ad campaign is so high that only these mega-corporations can pay and play. So they dominate the airwaves. It is essentially private ownership of the news.
That the public doesn't realize that free speech is not a right we enjoy equally since the most pervasive and powerful communications medium is controlled by so very few.
Mander gives a lot of statistics for viewers and hours viewed (5 hours per day is average!) but I posted not to go off on a rant about TV or the MSM but to help us understand that what we regard as the "news" is highly filtered to reflect the view of these very few, very large corporations.
In this regard we are not unlike Al Jazeera. And... we think of Al Jazeera as presenting highly selected and inflammatory news. I guess they have different sponsors <g>.
Understanding this sponsorship ratio is important. Quite literally, TSWHTF before PO gets honest representation at 6 P.M. And even then it will be filtered. So it truly is up to places like TOD to educate the public. As in New Orleans, help isn't on the way.
Mander expressed himself differently but I am not sure it changes things. 100 corporations effectively control the message.
What struck me was this... several threads back Goose opened with a discourse on Pab-u-lum. This concerned the TV docu-drama about oil/you were warned. A number of posters here indicated that:
A) it was "step" in the right direction.
B) the media was cautious about public perception.
C) the public wasn't ready (too dumb) to understand.
D) the coverage missed making the simple point about depletion in order to focus on various supply chain threats.
In other words, a selective, but benign, interpretation of the facts. But, and this is the issue... Suppose the TV folks weren't shoveling pab-u-lum, protecting us from self-panic? Did they not consider the Army Corps report that's making the rounds in blog-world, and issued in September 2005, not worth air-time?or not credible? Is the DOE's Hirsh report of Feb. 2005 not newsworthy... for a broadcast about oil scarcity?
Mander's point is that the MSM is must place the interests of its financial backers first.
My point is: peak oil'ers are wrong to believe the MSM is waiting for proof. Because if the Army knows the truth you can bet CNN does too. They have decided not to cover it.
That is a really big problem.