16 comments on Government doesn't accept imminent peak oil (Part 1)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
16 comments on Government doesn't accept imminent peak oil (Part 1)
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
- Aleklett's Energy Mix Global Energy Systems, Peak Oil, etc
- www.SamassaVeneessä.info Finnish peak oil site
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
The curve used to approximate oil production by Hubbert is not the Gaussian but the derivative of the a sigmoid curve, a special case of the logistics curve. See here and here. There are two justifications for using it. Firstly it fits fairly well quite a few oilfields and secondly it has some sort of theoretical backing for a very rough picture of oil production.
The growth of microbes in a limited culture medium approximates this curve. At first growth rises at a near exponential rate but, as food becomes a limiting feature, this growth slows, stops and reverses. A reasonable realistic mathematical model of this can be made that yields the curve analytically.
The application of this to oil production is not nearly so neat. However it does encapsulate the most important point about oil production. The biggest deposits are the easiest to find and are found near the start of exploration in any area and are exploited early on. Smaller fields are harder to find and have a lower yield. As a result despite increasing effort and investment output peaks and falls.
Oil fields are of course much more variable than microbes and all manner of individual political, financial, geological and meteorological factors come into play so the curves will not be accurate fits to the theoretical function. However much of the argument is between those who imagine oil production will increase for decades to come and those who believe the peak will come in only a few years and the moderately good empirical fit to the curve to a number of fields gives some weight to those that feel the peak is near.
I guess however none of this really addresses your point about producing nations artificially producing below their maximum. We could avoid that complication by assuming that all producers are producing at their maximums - proving that might be tricky though!